In Unification's Wake, Part 05: Business Impact with Notes by SOLREI

Elegant Reasonism In Unification’s Wake, Wake, Part 5 Business Impact Patent Pending 16405134 - USPTO Published 20200372376 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any documents, files, or previous e-mail messages attached to it, constitute an electronic communication within the scope of the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 USCA 2510. This communication may contain nonpublic, confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the sole use of the designated recipient(s). The unlawful interception, use or disclosure of such information is strictly prohibited pursuant to 18 USCA 2511 and any applicable laws. If you are not the intended recipient, if you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. Life Space Matters is a registered trademark of SolREI, Inc. H2Orbit is a trademark of SolREI, Inc.

Elegant Reasonism is the epistemology supported by a framework which holistically seek truth as a philosophical predicate priority consideration entering the study of nature through science. Elegant Reasonism is therefore in perfect harmony with the SOLREI company’s strategic brand intent of strategic sustainability. This presentation is about Elegant Reasonism’s impact to and influence of business enterprise. Our purpose is to focus on business leadership with this presentation and not get into weeds of detail either in technocracy nor process. There are aspects of Elegant Reasonism’s processes which leaders at every level of any enterprise will want to participate in order that they may facilitate their individual paradigm shifts. Many such paradigm shifts are hard won. Often they are facilitated by transformational leadership programs that bring increasing resolution and focus to precision and accuracy discussions in the context of quality as a function of value derivation both for the business and its consumers.

Notice This presentation is hyperlinked to SolREI, Inc’s primary website. The links herein will resolve only for registered users there. Registration is free. Once users are logged into our website, all hyperlinks in this presentation will resolve to their relative and respective landing pages. All other users will receive a standardized message concerning restricted content and reminding them to register. Simply register and log in to bypass that restriction message. 

Visit https://www.solrei.co



Ask about eligibility for VIP status



Review this presentation and click highlighted links as appropriate

This presentation is online with the SOLREI, INC website identified on the chart. Talking points: ● This and other presentations are in the User Library of the website • ./web/usr/library/solrei/documents/presentations • This particular presentation is in the Elegant Reasonism folder ● Registered users may enjoy: • Free access to the user library containing • Biographical data, papers, and articles • Scientific data, papers, and articles • .. and more • Early access to insights and material still under development • Blogs & Newsletters as they come online

Abstract Any method to perceive the unified Universe will ultimately be a derivative of Elegant Reasonism exactly because human physiology is part of the consideration being integrated. The resulting axiology behind such insights can be delivered in no other manner exactly because Langer Epistemology Errors of (within) encapsulated interpretive models preclude such perceptions. Essentially it is a Columbus’ Egg Problem. What we already know from thinking that can not close to unification is that they will obfuscate if not out right hide such factors. While it is vital for the enterprise to embrace Elegant Reasonism in order to assure situational awareness, it is even more important for shareholders to understand these issues or their investments are at risk. Failure to recognize such factors will exacerbate market volatility in every domain of discourse. Such risks influence the relative and respective business decisions needing to be made for that particular niche in the marketplace. Exacerbating these issues is how they affect the nature of competition, ethics, and dynamics. Relative and respective axiology (e.g. philosophy of value derivation) will reflect the integrity associated with Elegant Reasonism through evidence chains reflecting the unified Universe. The only good defense against any competitor wielding Elegant Reasonism is your organization wielding it better. The reason is simple, because in this particular case, apathy will result in your competitors mode shifting your portfolio out from under you. Mode shifted intellectual property constitutes insights available in no other manner and the implication of that single fact means that IP may be filed as a net new patent. There is no legislation on any of this at the moment. Yes we alerted the appropriate agencies. The situation now is how fast Elegant Reasonism based systems reviews can be conducted and relative and respective impacts determined in order to affect the appropriate strategy going forward in any planning.

If you have seen any of the previous videos from SOLREI INC then you know what Elegant Reasonism fundamentally is. What you may not be situationally aware of are the issues, impacts, and influences it has relative to business enterprise. A key insight from those earlier videos illuminates and illustrates that abstractions have a tendency to insulate and isolate higher ordered ideas from lower ordered detail. The label “Langer Epistemology Errors” or “LEEs” is the reference we use when individuals mistake those abstractions for actual reality. When we layer abstractions we also potentially layer these errors and when that happens we also get into situations geneticists call replicate of fading. That is to say errors become compounded and given the highly systemic nature of these abstractions in particular, it becomes a problem that must be dealt with. The epistemology and framework to conduct such systems reviews is Elegant Reasonism. It was specifically designed to address and cope with such issues and do so in context of science supporting business enterprise. In hindsight we should expect no less from anything claiming to accomplish unification. Elegant Reasonism is no different in that regard, and it steps up to the proverbial plate to get the job done.

Immediate Business Impact Elegant Reasonism represents an immediate business impact in the sense that it is both a carrot and the stick. Everything is dependent on how Elegant Reasonism is wielded. Analogies to the early West are not lost on us. Elegant Reasonism will metaphorically unleash millions of chihuahuas on existing enterprises, while others might replace those little dogs with piranhas. In any event the process decision checks (Chart 10) will drive the enterprise to embrace the generalized process flow (Chart 8) as they populate appropriate tools (Chart 9). Business talk shows will illuminate and illustrate the volatility gaps across the global economy and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) should take keen note now. 



In the hands of the global 2000 Elegant Reasonism represents: 

An opportunity to mine their existing portfolio for incremental value while simultaneously protecting those existing investments for continued value delivery to consumers



Leverage HR pools to develop new markets



Refocus R&D

In the hands of Small to Medium Businesses Elegant Reasonism represents: 

An opportunity to develop and exploit niche markets and develop unique insights



An opportunity to review what it is we think we know to affect systems reviews to mode shift insights into alignment with the unified Universe

In the hands of entrepreneurs Elegant Reasonism represents: 

An opportunity to exploit Patent Databases for insights not currently being delivered to the marketplace (e.g. exploit apathy or lethargy in larger organizations)



Assets ensnared in status quo (e.g. M1/M2 thinking) are low hanging fruit to be mode shifted for insight development

The core message of this chart to leaders within any business is that any mode of thinking which can not accomplish unification is not presenting all of the facts to management nor to shareholders and stakeholders. It’s just that simple and that hard cold fact holds implications to volatility, competition, value chains, and consumers – worldwide. Where your niche exists within the global economy will likely dictate how you approach Elegant Reasonism. Your niche will shape opportunity, and competitive threat relative to your strategic brand intent and the value statements you strive for with your customer base. The better you are able to wield Elegant Reasonism the better you will be able to accomplish these goals and objectives.

Immediate Implications The immediate threat to any business is competitive recognition velocity. The larger the intellectual property portfolio being leveraged by an enterprise the greater this threat is. 

Is there an immediate impact to every business? Likely yes, but that doesn’t necessarily mean you have to change what you are doing. Why? Because what you are doing may not depend on unification. If it does not, and what you are doing is logically correct, then you may not have urgency others may. You would still want to position yourself. 



Are you part of a larger value chain which must exhibit evidence chain linkage to the unified Universe? What is the core message delivered by your strategic plan?

The reason is simple. Mode shifting existing IP into alignment with the unified Universe represents an effort producing a net new insight and opportunity; which means it represents a patentable asset that can be independently filed either by the original owner or an interloper wielding Elegant Reasonism more effectively than that original owner. 

No legislation exists in any form regarding such efforts either offensively or defensively, nor probably should there be. Natural market forces should prevail.



The only defense for any business against such an attack is wielding Elegant Reasonism before your competitors do.



Free markets are going to normalize across the global marketplace. The only question is the degree to which your enterprise remains viable at that time.

The immediate implications will manifest not just from your organization but the holistic economic environment in which you operate. The extended value chain or chains in which your organization participates may hold differing implications. Do not make the mistake of believing you are immune from associated volatility or competitive dynamics. You must think systemically, holistically, and maintain critical situational awareness thinking.

Discerning Unification 

Problem: Problem: Abstractions



Challenge: Challenge: Human physiology inherently setup people to commit Langer Epistemology Errors because the CNS automatically furnishes our brains abstractions in order to cope with reality.



Alternatives: Alternatives: 1) Continue w/Status Quo, 2) Start All Over, 3) Embrace Elegant Reasonism



Choice: Choice: No 3.



Rationale: Rationale: 1) Leverages existing knowledge, 2) Preserves existing IP & Investements, 3) Illuminates the path forward



Next Steps: Steps: Embrace No 3



Owner: Owner: Each individual freely

The Flammarion wood carving circa 1888

The Flammarion engraving is a wood engraving by an unknown artist, so named because its first documented appearance is in Camille Flammarion's 1888 book L'atmosphère : météorologie populaire ("The Atmosphere: Popular Meteorology"). Here, it is a good metaphor for attempting to discern reality. Talking points: ● Traditional science stereotypically employs the epistemology Empiricism in the consideration of evidence. The reasons are many but primarily so experimental data may be duplicated by other people. That is possible because all humans have the same experiential physiology. ● Elegant Reasonism is a net new epistemology which demands truth as a function of the unified Universe as a predicate priority consideration and in that context drives past limitations imposed by human physiology. Elegant Reasonism employs Empiricism as a subset epistemology. Bayesian analytics (and more) are employed to discern distinctions where precise discrimination is required. ● Abstractions are noted from the smallest constructs to the largest known to science and systemic relationships must be recognized in full context of unification and in compliance with Elegant Reasonism rules as well as the Realm of C’s (which we will talk about shortly). ● Commission of Langer Epistemology Errors ensnares one’s mind inside logic traps that can be insidiously subtle. For this reason the concept of unification must be a philosophical predicate priority consideration. Science must once again be recognized as the philosophy of nature but now with special requirements of equipment, methods, and processes. Modern practitioners often believe science distinct from philosophy rather than embracing its traditional/historic roots. 6

Approach to Business Impact

 Problem Since status

quo thinking can not accomplish unification, subsequently aspects of the unified Universe are obfuscated for business enterprise worldwide thus wasting significant capital, lost opportunity, time, and expending precious resources on equipment designed to chase red herrings.

 Challenge Statement Status quo thinkers

& littoral thinkers are unwittingly committing Langer Epistemology Errors which affects all professional organizations, peer groups, and peer reviewed efforts. Because they fail to perceive the mechanics of the shackles ensnaring them they fail to recognize the opportunity which usually means they also fail to perceive the competitive threat it represents (e.g. they will never see the threat until its too late).

 Alternatives 1) Stand Pat/Deny,

2) Look for external expert, 3) Embrace Elegant Reasonism & Explore Introspectively

 Choice No: 3

 Rationale The General Use License Aligns

for Elegant Reasonism is being provided openly and free worldwide & people are learning

with unification, protects assets, positions for future, assures customer value & business integrity

Standing

pat poses competitive risk and potential loss of IP portfolio to interlopers. This is the first time in human history unification has ever been accomplished. SOLREI, INC are the experts and are freely & openly sharing info worldwide for simultaneous worldwide confirmation, review, and adoption as appropriate. Encourage others for global systems review.

 Next Steps Engage and embrace Secure commercial

https://www.solrei.co. https://www.solrei.co. Engage for systems review if necessary.

usage license from SOLREI, INC

 Owners Global

enterprise, government, academia, R&D, and individuals employing Elegant Reasonism for commercial gain

SOLREI INC executive management employs this framework in its problem reconciliation approach. Problem statements are limited to one cogent sentence. The challenges that problem statement holds for business enterprise is limited to two cogent statements. All problems facing executive management must present three alternatives, even if you think solving it is obvious. This forces the business to consider options that may be out of the box thinking, orthogonal, or non-sequitur. Executives at SOLREI may be the ones completing this framework but they have to answer to stakeholders and others so choice selection is anything but easy. This is especially true when the choices are difficult. Everyone is expected to rationalize the choice made and limit the reasons to five to six bullets of a single cogent sentence or phrase. Fewer is better, but must cover both pros and cons of the decision in support of the decision made. Once the choice is rationalized everyone must consider what next steps must be taken. Executive managers will then want to know who owns actions associated with reconciling this problem to resolution. Some company will not allow employees to talk to executive management without first having completed a similar framework under these rules. 7

Moving left to right across this chart will take anyone from status quo thinking (e.g. M1 or M2 entrenched thinking) toward unification. Those individuals vested in the status quo will likely get hung up on the left hand side of this chart. Likely they will fundamentally fail to grasp the implication of Langer Epistemology Errors. They will cite past experimental successes rather than look for alternative explanations for those successes. Many issues with status quo thinking are scale dependent and practitioners typically do not connect constructs spanning scales. Many traditional epistemologies have human physiology in common. That trait they all share is a facet of justification and rationalization within the respective and relative context established by that epistemology. Elegant Reasonism on the other hand seeks truth as a philosophical predicate priority consideration as a function of the unified Universe. That distinction provides an almost ineffable quality to insights it delivers. Elegant Reasonism insights are both deep and broad. They redefine reach and range. While to many they do not change ‘what happens’, they do change why those things that happen are true. And that is powerful exactly because it connects your insights to everything real.

Enabling Mode Shifting As of 4Q2019 there were seven (7) recognized Encapsulated Interpretive Models: M0: Newtonian

2D Articulation Layer

Pn1

M1: Modern variant mass M2: Einstein’s Invariant Mass

ISO 9001 Unification Tool

2D Articulation

Pn2

Context & Source Model Integrity Analysis

M3: PV of M1 or M2

Pn3

Paradigm Statistics

M4: M5 emulating M1 or M2 Pn4

M5: LV of The Emergence Model M6: PV of The Emergence Model

M2M ↔ Paradigms

Logic Calculus Reality Validation

Bayesian Analytics Heuristics

M7: Reserved

Metacognitive Analytics Six Sigma Analytic Stack (e.g. 3D Layering) *

* Analytic Stack may be implemented logically or physically as appropriate

Elegant Reasonism encapsulates fundamental thinking critically into seven recognized interpretive models (of the Universe) and requires any given investigation or systems review to employ at least one which closes to unification. So as the generalized process is completed, what becomes illuminated and illustrated are not just insights about the unified Universe, but why previous thinking failed to see those insights. Education roadmaps are intrinsically built as a result. Knowledge management can then come into its own for HR skill development purposes. The justification and rationalization for actions the business takes are an innate result of formal treatment of Elegant Reasonism. We should point out that Elegant Reasonism does not have to be employed in formal treatment or fullest extent every single time it is used. All practitioners are encouraged to keep everything as simple as possible. Quick whiteboard or chalk board discussions may be all that are needed. However, if fully compliant ISO 9001 QMS standards or industry standard quality programs are required then the framework can accommodate that treatment as well.

Process Decision Checkpoint Flow Unified Thinking?

Yes

Recognition

Illumination

Analysis

No No

Abstraction Inventory

Langer Yes Epistemology Errors?

Working with Abstractions or Reality? Reality

Mode Shift Effectively? Yes

Yes

No Develop Holistic Insights

Yes Abstractions

You are likely committing Langer Epistemology Errors

Realm of C’s Compliant?

Translation Matrices Effective? No Improve

No Investigation Effective? Yes

Unified Treatise

Executives and managers might be first inclined to skip investigative reviews of these checkpoints but SOLREI INC encourages transformational leaders to participate in order to make sure they are aligned with the problem solving relative to their business operations. The holistic team (e.g. everyone in the company) should be on the same proverbial page. Understanding the details behind these checkpoints will provide that situational awareness. Click pause and study the last several charts if you need to. Also know that the PDF presentation file has each of these flow chart steps hyperlinked back into SOLREI INC’s website for further detail. Managers should recognize that status quo thinkers will likely get hung up on the left hand side of this chart. It is important everyone comprehend the implications of mistaking abstractions for reality holds for the business. Business planers, and others, will likely be familiar with the c’s of business plans. They are words like coherent, cogent, cohesive, etc. Here, those words are included but they also include ‘close’ (to unification) and many others. Click the link there to explore how the realm of the c’s illuminates your ability to illustrate how your business gains alignment with the unified Universe.

Tools & Business Purpose Elegant Reasonism is the framework and epistemology required to perceive and engage the unified Universe, but within these utilities are tools and they are wielded with specialized purposes. It is imperative that executive management comprehend those purposes because their enterprise depends on their being able to derive value and deliver it to the consumer. If you can not see that value then neither will your customer. Your customer will then seek that value from your competitors. 



ISO 9001 Unification Tool 

Abstraction Inventory



Relational database chronicling abstractions and their various relationships, by encapsulated interpretive model (relationships may then be searched for insights)



Quantifies & Codifies abstractions



Identifies where potential Langer Epistemology Errors are likely being committed

Translation Matrices 

Enables Mode Shifting



Analytics solidify thinking by encapsulated interpretive model  Illuminates how competitors are likely thinking  Develops road maps to facilitate paradigm shifts across the enterprise



Develops insights to affect organizational paradigm shifts



Unifies marketing while simultaneously exploits specific disciplines  Developed insights are integrated faster and with better targeting

Business leadership should not get hung up on terms like Matrices. Concrete thinkers will want to use such terms to exclusion and that would likely result in mistakes. The company encourages a holistic approach to use of these tools. The first systems review undertaken by SOLREI INC produced an 828 page manuscript (now obsolete). While the text of that manuscript is linear (because it was turned into a book) it was handled as if it were a three dimensional matrix. Mathematical formulas were explicitly declared as were each parameter. Linkages between elements were explicitly provided out to all other sections across the entire range of the manuscript. Investigators and planners would be keen to produce documents supporting their efforts in a similar manner. While it should be noted that many of the various manuscript generating software applications provide such features, they are not consistently applied. Each should be considered unique because if you do not there will be compatibility issues if you have a diverse team working on the same file. Today’s enterprise will likely need to standardize on one particular approach and then stick with it. SOLREI INC uses LibreOffice running under Linux for these reasons. It should also be pointed out that as adoption of Elegant Reasonism matures across the enterprise so will specific linkage constructs document to document. A standardization on linkage point lables will be both easier and more congruent with ISO 9001 QMS standards.

Critical Situationally Aware Thinking A subsequent presentation will be dedicated to critical thinking in context of Elegant Reasonism exactly because it must be extensively applied across the generalized process flow as well as the decision checkpoint flowchart. We must be constantly alert and situationally aware of Langer Epistemology Errors and their relative and respective implications.



Elegant Reasonism epistemology facts, justification, rationalization, and evidence chains are all in context of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority consideration and must survive the analytical rigor and discipline of employed tools and QMS standards.



Critical Thinking demands we constantly and incessantly asses whether or not any given thought, concept or evidence has been based on any LEE.

The phrase ‘critical thinking’ has been around for a long time at this point. SOLREI INC encourages Elegant Reasonism practitioners to recognize critical thinking must now also be ‘situationally aware’ relative to the decision checkpoint flow. It is not slight that Elegant Reasonism is considered both an Epistemology and a framework that are symbiotic and must holistically support one another. As the generalized process flow guides investigation teams conducting systems reviews the decision checkpoint flow chart 10 must employ critical situationally aware thinking.

Evidence Chains Elegant Reasonism’s framework employs processes, methods, and tools in order to derive a fully compliant Treatise reflecting truth as a function of the unified Universe. The generalized process flows across Recognition, Illumination, and Analysis phases in order to populate tools enabling the proper analytic stack layers for insight development. Elegant Reasonism recognizes the highly systemic nature of core constructs up through orders of configuration complexities from the smallest construct to the largest known to science and everything in between. At every step and stage there exist ‘control points’ representing ‘links’ in that systemic path which might be metaphorically represented by a chain. Evidence then is only as strong as the weakest link in that systemic set of relationships forming that chain which links a concept back into the model reflecting the unified Universe. 

Are essentially elegant, they minimize ‘brute force alignment’; rather seek truth in unification



Abstractions tend to insulate and isolate higher ordered ideas from lower ordered detail and it is therefore critical to assure strong linkage from core constructs and concepts from the encapsulated interpretive model isotropically. Evidence chains provide that function.



The purpose of such chains link a given investigative concept to the various aspects reflecting the unified Universe. Information sciences protocols are in full force and effect.



Evidence Chains while designed to tie out an investigation to the model reflecting the unified Universe, they also illuminate models which do not close to unification (and why) thus providing illustration for learning purposes. Bayesian analysis within Elegant Reasonism will yield road maps for business organizations to modify plans, skills, and strategies to best adapt and cope to changing scenarios and circumstances necessary to meet competitive threats head on.

The take away for business leaders is that evidence chains provide the three dimensional linkage across charts 8, 9, and 10 in support of developing fully compliant treatise which illustrate and illuminate truth as a function of the unified Universe.

Business Leaders, executives, managers and administrators in every aspect of business worldwide are invited to inspect Elegant Reasonism with their own independent critical situationally aware thinking and discern for themselves what it is, how it works, and the results it has obtained to date. The more you contemplate our online materials the more it will make sense to you. Elegant Reasonism closes to unification, but that is not the issue here. Herein we are concerned implications to the enterprise, be it business or any other large organization of any type. 

Status quo thinking will never perceive the unified Universe which means that they are wearing blinders incapable of reporting accurate risks and opportunity to management.



What are the set of evidence chains linking your business out to the unified Universe?



What aspects of the unified Universe impact or influence your business?



How does this affect or influence decisions the enterprise may make or needs to make?



How does this affect or influence shareholder value and their ROI?



Is the business chasing red herrings? What impact to ROI does this have?



Are there engineering aspects that influence what it is you do?



Are you leaving opportunity on the table?



What are your competitors doing?



How does this affect or influence your value chain?

Are geopolitical operations impacted in any way? If so, how?

All enterprise management, executive or otherwise, is charged by owners of the company (e.g. shareholders) in maximizing return on investment (ROI). They want the most profit from the least expense. Hence PE ratios. The better those numbers the more investing consumers like it. It doesn’t matter if those investors are individuals or institutional in nature. They essentially desire the same result for the same reasons. The fundamental issue at the base of all this is axiology. Axiology is the philosophy of value derivation. The burning question on the table effective November 26 th, 2020 concerns whether or not the enterprise embodies an axiology capable of perceiving the real tapestry of the unified Universe or not. It is a yes no question. Either it can or it can not perceive the unified Universe. Only an enterprise which can may employ that capability to affect an axiology capable of deriving value from such an alignment. If your enterprise is not situationally aware of the implications of Elegant Reasonism then you are limited by your own status quo thinking. And that, is something investors worldwide are going to consider a metric going forward. To what degree does the enterprise embrace Elegant Reasonism? Is the enterprise going to be competitive in the realm of the unified Universe.

Professional Organizations Many business enterprises support employees in various professional organizations because it helps the business, the individual employee, and the profession as a whole. At the end of the day, that approach improves the candidate pool HR can draw upon. Others expect the employee to take charge of these relationships as a matter of professional conduct in their chosen field. These various organizations constitute bodies of peers in the relative and respective area of endeavor. 

Are your members capable of recognizing evidence chains linking what they do to the unified Universe? Do they understand the part they play? What is the basis of truth they perceive?



Peer relationships matter in cases and scenarios where peer review is necessary or expected



Peers comprised of constituents failing to perceive unification will potentially entrench status quo thinking inside a logic trap incapable of accomplishing unification (e.g. gaining the precipice necessary to bring elements necessary together) NOTE: There is considerable historical evidence that this scenario has played out for over the last 100 years, if not longer.



This situation potentially obfuscates the path forward



It institutionalizes failure to grasp commission of Langer Epistemology Errors

Commission of Langer Epistemology Errors creates logic traps from which the only escape known to humanity is Elegant Reasonism

Collectively we find ourselves in a very difficult situation since professional organizations currently do not recognize the logic trap ensnaring them (See charts 8, 9, & 10 in this presentation). Professional organizations failing to embrace Elegant Reasonism do worse than fail to see opportunity, they solidify the grip the status quo logic trap has upon their demographic community, and without exception.

Professional organization, some which represent official positions of their members as a matter of legal statute (i.e. bar associations, Realtor associations, Medical professionals, architects, engineering professionals, etc.) all now need to consider how Elegant Reasonism affects their members and audiences. Professional organizations supporting peer review groups should be aware that Elegant Reasonism very directly affects what it is they do and how they accomplish the vetting process. There is an argument to be made that human physiology strategically inhibits empiricism in so much as human central nervous system (CNS) intrinsically furnishes the human brain (via Brodmann Areas & associated neural networks) with abstractions in order to relate to the world around us. While these abstractions allow us to share common experiences and relate them to others they also trick us into believing we are working directly with reality and nothing could be further from the truth.

Publishers Publishers are now warned that status quo thinking pre 2021 will never accomplish unification. Elegant Reasonism directly affects their editorial boards and vetting processes used for content submissions for peer review. This is true regardless of the domain of discourse addressed by their publications. Leverage chart 10 in the development of your content. Help your readers understand. 

Content now must fully comply with the realm of c’s, most especially closure to unification



Can your editorial review board:



 



Recognize evidence chains linking out to the reflected unified Universe? Do they actively look for truth in content as a function of the unified Universe?



Are they ensnared by Langer Epistemology Errors? Errors?

Are Unification Evidence Chains cleanly illustrated? 

Quantifies and codifies relationships to the unified Universe or existing Elegant Reasonism compliant materials



Systemic constructs must clearly be supported



Are scale invariant



Are free of Langer Epistemology Errors



Enable Mode Shifting in full compliance of the realm of c’s

Illuminate and illustrate historical thinking relative to mode shifted context of the unified Universe Appropriate level of detail documented across Elegant Reasonism framework, framework, tools, and Epistemology exactly because others must be enabled to confirm Analysis and Treatise

Publishers who vet professional papers, generally of a science or engineering perspective, are on notice effective November 26 th, 2020 that the USPTO published SOLREI, INC’s patent accomplishing unification. This strategic accomplishment changes the dynamics of peer review content, contemplation, and the criteria on which evidence is made manifest.

Business of Education Most institutionalized education is directly affected by Elegant Reasonism and it is our collective progeny at stake here. This is especially true for profit-centric institutions. Academic institutions fall into one of three areas: cost centers, not for profit organizations, and business (e.g. profitcentric). The latter must balance fiscal resources across many domains in order to keep the doors open and the acumen delivered. They all share an effectiveness metric relative to skills delivered. Change is constant. The unified Universe just is, and if you do not embrace it light will be where you are not. There is no such thing as darkness, only the absence of light. There is no such thing as cold, only the absence of thermodynamic action (e.g. heat). 

Institutions ensnared in status quo thinking are liable for shackling students in paradigms which do not close to unification. Truth there is delivered by an epistemology aligned to human physiology and not the unified Universe. 



Institutions aligned with Elegant Reasonism seek to deliver truth as a function of the unified Universe. Such institutions seek to eliminate Langer Epistemology Errors. Errors. They always hold reality distinct and litmus from models reflecting it. Critical thinking recognizes encapsulated interpretations and quality metrics derived from industry standards. 



Axiology delivered as a function of epistemology must be derived from the unified Universe.

What are the evidence chains delivered by your institution? What core message is delivered?

The business of all education is establishing a foundation of peers as a function of the unified Universe capable of critical thinking enough to discern implications of Langer Epistemology Errors and holding reality litmus. Anything less subjugates students to a life ensnared and otherwise held hostage by paradigms incapable of full compliance with the realm of c’s or the slightest affinity with the unified Universe.

All academic organizations in the business of education are also on notice that effective November 26th, 2020 the USPTO published Elegant Reasonism, accomplishing unification. Elegant Reasonism is the epistemology and framework holistically seeking truth as a function of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority consideration. Any truth incapable of similar accomplishment will be statistically weighted to the degree that they can, and accordingly positioned relative to reality. Reality is unified, whether or not your thinking about it is.

Industries Different industries will likely be affected in different ways. Obviously medical pharmacology will be different than the finance sector. Fundamentally all require knowledge resulting from an effective systems review where results are folded back to the enterprise. 

Risk Management: Perception of risk illuminated



Pharmacology: Molecular interactions and bonds as a function of architectural mass



Materials: Atomic and subatomic interactions as a function of architectural mass



Axiology relative to land use is usually defined as ‘highest and best’ and codified locally; perception then is a function of recognition in context of the unified Universe and not just what is superficially obvious to human senses



How do your evidence chains link out through your value chain and distribution channels? There is a laundry list of businesses and industries and the common thread through each of these, deals with R&D associated with ‘architectures of mass’ and classes of such. 

The Emergence Model of Particle Physics mode shifts The Standard Model



Experiments designed to seek out architectures of mass



Experiments designed to seek out manifestation of properties as a function of architecture and their relative and respective ability to influence interactions

The fundamental epicenter for all of these activities is: value (e.g. axiology). axiology). How we derive it, protect existing investments, and maximize it going forward for consumers worldwide.

Mode shifting axiology, the philosophy of value derivation, toward the unified Universe will likely cause volatility and unforeseen competitive dynamics across all industries. As we gain insights into the architectures of mass there will be winners and losers across the economic landscape.

Long Term Implications Long term implications might be discerned through clues already in hand. Both the WMAP data and data from the 2018 Kepler Satellite have intriguing results not visible until it is mode shifted. Mode shifted in this way seemingly vindicates The Emergence Model and its implications. The question though remains, what can we accomplish because we have such insight capabilities? 

R&D into complex composite architectures of mass 

New experiments designed in context of Elegant Reasonism



Structure equals properties and properties infer intrinsic structure - and increased situational awareness about structure may mean the ability to manifest properties available in no other manner.…



Elegant Reasonism provided the means for connecting fundamental forces of nature but further R&D empowers that ability with capability and situational awareness of applications and future manufacturing development.



Global situational awareness of biosphere interactions will very likely have deeper implications and greater meaning.



A reassessment of materials throughout the solar system will likely realign priorities

Long term critical situational awareness thinking in context of Elegant Reasonism suggests increased importance and value to the Earth and her biosphere. Mother Earth represents, circa 2021, the only habitable planet in the solar system. It is not too big to die nor to be killed by anthropogenic activity. While travel around the solar system is evidently problematic, interstellar flight is an entirely different matter. The point being that we may not leave this system in the foreseeable future. Consequently it would be prudent for humanity to consider Earth our primary home and we must revisit its value in context of these insights. Strategic sustainability takes on both deeper and broader consequences in that context. Business enterprise axiology therefore must reflect strategic sustainability priorities in support of competitive endurance. Shortsightedness would otherwise doom civilization ensnared in wishful thinking that will never manifest.

Volatility Economic volatility can be divided into short term and long term. While we might chose different definitions for those two lengths of time, what seems most suited here are those used by the Internal Revenue Service, for what ought to be obvious reasons. The near term is likely consumed by tasks associated with learning and increasing critical situational awareness thinking across the enterprise. 

Elegant Reasonism took SOLREI, INC some 17 years to recognize, develop, & patent 



The question on the table now is, can you embrace it faster than your competition.

The only business defense is wielding Elegant Reasonism before your competition Mode Shifting IP constitutes a net new asset exactly because it is not possible to perceive an M5/M6 asset from within M1, M2, or M3. Mode shift the IP and refile. The more certain in their wielding M1 detail sets, the stronger the trap ensnarment (see Chart 10)

SOLREI, INC: 

The marketplace must seek its own commercial level



Publishing all information as fast our resources allow and in as transparent a manner as is humanly possible. Registered users are free to share info with one another



We are working to insure materials are broadly available across as many platforms as possible (including our own)



Presentation files (e.g. PDF) are backlinked into our website for registered users

Market volatility will likely arise as individual businesses worldwide reassess their relative and respective value chains in context of competitive dynamics. Many of these factors will dissipate as companies worldwide embrace Elegant Reasonism and it becomes the operational norm. Circa 2021, however, it is not the norm, consequently natural market forces prevail.

Envisioned Programs SOLREI, INC envisions a number of programs to facilitate business enterprise of all sizes maximize effective use of Elegant Reasonism. Program focus ranges from individual education opportunities to institutional consulting engagements. A few programs are (but not limited to): 



Certification of: 

Business personnel



Consulting practitioners



Educators



R&D Scientists & Engineers



Systems Engineers

Direct consulting engagements from SOLREI, INC with clients 



Our priority is bringing enablers up to speed on Elegant Reasonism

Media Releases 

Articles, Newsletters, Presentations, Videos, etc.



Network content



Software (application, platform, and customized solutions)

SOLREI, INC is working to operationalize a business plan facilitating others to engage the global economy in context of Elegant Reasonism. As a function of that approach we are working to establish accredited certification programs spanning the spectrum of business and academia. The long term goal of these programs is for global enterprise to effectively wield Elegant Reasonism. We are also working to establish newsletters, and other printed vehicles (like magazines), presentations and streaming content online. We are also looking at development of software applications for a variety of purposes.

Enterprise Skills Elegant Reasonism is inherently a multidisciplinary endeavor and it is so directly due to the intrinsic nature of unification. In hindsight that point should be patently obvious. Thinking that a focused effort exclusively based on physical sciences will prevail, it will not and it won’t exactly for all the reasons that demographic did not accomplish unification in the first place. Systems Engineering: leading systems reviews in order to properly position requirements and assist with IT based knowledge management applications. Key in all phases R, I, & A. Physical sciences: R&D efforts into phenomena/property manifestations as a function of unified Universe. Systems review of what it is we thought we knew and why. Key illumination phase skills.

Educators: building on road maps as a function of systems review’s Bayesian analytics. Building & delivering skills compliant with the realm of c’s. Business Management: risk management situational awareness including root cause analysis as a function of Elegant Reasonism fully compliant Treatise development and execution against those plans. Government: spans economic and national security spectrum.

Wielding Elegant Reasonism effectively requires a multidisciplinary skill set. Because the nature of Elegant Reasonism touches every human endeavor, there are also no skill sets not influenced to some degree. Skills needed to deploy Elegant Reasonism, circa 2021, center in systems engineering, education, business management, physical sciences, and an array of areas in government. As Elegant Reasonism matures the linkages between these skill sets will become increasingly clear and important.

Barrier to Entry The term ‘barrier to entry’ is stereo-typically employed by businesses to thwart competition. Sometimes attempts to lower consumer costs attempt to justify it. Elegant Reasonism brings a whole new set of criteria to these factors. 

Human beings are naturally unaware of how their physical makeup manifests abstractions in order to cope with the world around them. People naturally make Langer Epistemology Errors every day and the vast majority are not cognizant of commission. The question on the table is what liability does business incur if you manipulate people who are not situationally aware through no fault of their own?



Entrenched M1/M2 thinking (e.g. status quo) constitutes a barrier to entry to situational awareness in context of the unified Universe, much less M5/M6 thinking. How this affects the enterprise depends on a large number of factors. Some briefly discussed in this set of charts. Situational awareness becomes a skill in its own right as a function of critical thinking in context of the factors and insights impacting or influencing your business. Being capable of dynamically mode shifting discussions in a situationally aware manner is vital to effectively wielding Elegant Reasonism in complex enterprise management.

Effective November 26th, 2020 when the USPTO published Elegant Reasonism status quo thinking became obsolete and how we contemplate the realm in which we exist forever mode shifts to the new foundation. Failure to recognize the implications of Langer Epistemology Errors, on the decision checkpoint flowchart (chart 10 in this presentation) will obfuscate and preclude critical situational awareness thinking capable of perceiving and engaging the actual unified Universe. Those individuals and business enterprises failing to comprehend the implications of such errors will find themselves on the wrong side of history. Recognizing those implications is the key unlocking the gateway to unification and the precipice it represents.

Human Action Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, is by Ludwig von Mises, has spawned a revolution every bit as much as Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations. Human Action is written from the point of view of humans exercising their free will and independent action as a driving cause/factor for economics. One need only read the single cogent paragraph of The Emergence Model to see direct correlation between the two bodies of work through the action principle & intrinsic nature of M5. 



To understand the economic relationships one must comprehend (in order) systemically: 

Abstraction Systems (as a function of intellect) relative to human physiology (especially Brodmann Areas of the brain and their relative and respective memories - e.g. NNRP patterns)



Human physiology (Especially Brodmann areas to CNS) to biology



Biology to organic matter



Organic matter & inorganic matter as a function of The Emergence Model



and finally The Fundamental Entanglement Function, Function, limited by Severance as a function of the intrinsic nature of Most Basic Particles (MBPs)

Information Science architectures like the REpresentational REpresentational State Transfer (REST) model for expectations of generalized transactions across a network. 

Also broadly the characteristics of Object Oriented Systems and their nature



Langer Epistemology Errors and more broadly Langer’s body of work



Systems Engineering principles, practices, and processes most especially extremely permuted views of systems (including systems of systems, nested systems, etc.) both logical and physical resulting from the above insights

Ironically Human Action is a treatise on economics written by Ludwig Von Mises originally in 1949. Mises sees economic calculation as the most fundamental problem in economics. The economic problem to Mises is that of action. Human action is an application of human reason to select the best means of satisfying ends. The reasoning mind evaluates and grades different options. This is economic calculation. Economic calculation is common to all people. Human reason and economic calculation have limitations, but Mises sees no alternative to economic calculation as a means of using scarce resources to improve our well being. Modern economics is built upon ideas of contentment-equilibrium analysis and indifference conditions. It is true that some economists construct models of dynamic equilibrium, but the idea of a dynamic equilibrium is oxymoronic to Mises. An actual equilibrium may involve a recurring cycle, but not true dynamics. True dynamics involve non-repeating evolutionary change. Mises links progress and profits. Profits earned from voluntary trades are the indicator of economic success. It is monetary calculation of profits that indicates whether an enterprise has generated a net increase in consumer well being over true economic costs. Loss, in Mises' own words, is failure, and is simply consumers projecting to the theoretical entrepreneur that he has failed. The close association that Mises draws between economic calculation and monetary calculation leads him to conclude that market prices (upon which monetary profits are calculated) are indispensable to progress in bettering the human condition. Without markets there are no prices, and without prices there is no economic calculation. Monetary calculation is vitally important. Mises establishes that the allocation of resources requires economic calculation. In his view, without economic calculation, there is no economy, as one cannot allocate resources in a rational manner. Mises stresses the importance of entrepreneurship because only entrepreneurs actually do monetary calculation. This fact puts entrepreneurs at the center of all progress (and failure). 24

Frames of Reference The Emergence Model, the first product of Elegant Reasonism closing to reflect unification, is an encapsulated interpretive model (of the unified Universe). That model establishes two types of reference frames: one where real objects interact called the Event Frame, Frame, and one where real objects are completely isolated interacting exclusively within itself (but may hold a vector within an Event Frame) is called a Local Frame. Frame. Local frame vectors within an Event Frame are derivative concepts stemming from the discontinuous nature of configurations of MBPs as a function of The Fundamental Entanglement Function, Function, limited by Severance. Severance. We might presuppose that the Event Frame’s seven phase steps (EFPSn) are the domain of discourse in theoretical astrophysics, but we would not be correct in that assumption. Humans interacting in the conduct of commerce exist within an Event Frame. Actions between real systems might be well below thresholds of perception but they are taking place, even if only within detail sets of abstractions and constructs hidden by layers of familial conversation. 

EFPS1 - Cascade To Severance



EFPS1 - Cascade to New Market



EFPS2 - Geodesic Interval



EFPS2 - Isolated Market Development



EFPS3 - Interactive



EFPS3 - Initial Market Awareness



EFPS4 - Resonant Feedback



EFPS4 - IPO/Disruptive Action



EFPS5 - MaxQ



EFPS5 - Maximum Market Impact



EFPS6 - Subsidance



EFPS6 - Market Normalization



EFPS7 - Endurance



EFPS7 - Competitive Endurance

The standard reference frame for interacting complex composite architectures of mass is the Event Frame and it has seven epicenters of predominate character, labeled Event Frame Phase Step 1 through 7. Holistically they describe motion from A to B where A & B merge. However, merger is not necessarily required. The Earth-Moon system are locked in the cusp of EFPS3 and EFPS4, for example. On 14 September 2015 LIGO observed GW150914 where two black holes were observed to merge. The merger was described in three phases: ‘in-spiral’, ‘merger’, and ‘ring down’. Those three descriptors are equivalent to EFPS4, 5, and 6. GW150914 transited those three phases in something about one half second and merged into a black hole of some with masses of approximately 35 times and 30 times the mass of the Sun (in the source frame), resulting in a postmerger black hole of some 62 solar masses. Part of the point here on this chart is that the same frame of reference can refer to economic market dynamics as it can to merger of Black Holes billions of lightyears from Earth and the same is true relative to quantum mechanics. What the famous two-slit experiment and a phenomena called a ‘glory’ (rainbow seen from aircraft with the aircraft’s shadow in the center) have in common is The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance. See SolREI Studios video experiment illustrating the ‘glory’.

Competitive Threat The nature of competition in a free market is highly dependent on entrepreneurial spirit, passion, and ingenuity. Bastions of institutionalized status quo thinking failing to recognize the significance of unification will be the most disrupted by Elegant Reasonism. So much so they may feel threatened to the core of their strategic brand intent. Their solution is to wield Elegant Reasonism before their competitors take them to the proverbial cleaners. What SOLREI INC promised the SEC was support for organic critical situational awareness thinking across the free market. The company is providing our insights to everyone via our website at the same time and other materials link back there as well, holistically fulfilling that promise. We only provide materials to targeted consumers after it is posted to the website. We try to alert key influencers and market analysts to implications as best we can but they too may engage the website at their free will. Circa 2021, civilization is essentially stunned. The company felt the same way when all of this was first recognized. McGowen’s Knowledge Management law stating that ‘knowledge will never penetrate the population faster than a Kelvin wake” is in full organic play and effective November 26th, 2020 the games have begun. 

Elegant Reasonism is disruptive to status quo thinking, and the genie is out of the bottle



Unification must be a philosophical predicate priority consideration isotropic to the enterprise



Elegant Reasonism seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe 

And not any given encapsulated interpretive model, including The Emergence Model



You think you can build a better fully compliant model? Go for it!



Elegant Reasonism only gets stronger when better models are employed



Existing intellectual property must be mode shifted and refiled in order to protect it.



Appropriate organizations and agencies have been alerted to these issues.



The Elegant Reasonism patent is worldwide, protected by appropriate law and treaty.

The nature of competition has been turned on its head. Allegorical references to the “Wild West” are not lost on anyone. Civilization now finds itself in a place not where it thought it was. Collectively we were arrogant and our institutionalized thinking collectively reinforced the wrong paradigms. Those situations have now entered into EFPS6. Arguably many will believe themselves in MAXQ (e.g. EFPS5) that is a locally nested Event within the larger Event Frame consistent with McGowen’s KM law. Only the fullness of time and history will tell that story.

Example Impact: 01 Finance Industry: you are tasked with assessing the risk associated with an IT company’s portfolio and position in the market in order to determine their business strength. The company has a broad portfolio of existing IP, some very entrenched in status quo thinking. Significant resources are being applied to leading edge technologies but they are delivering less than stellar results and no one understands why. Your report will be central to that company’s annual report to shareholders and reflect on audits and your efforts as well, not to mention the SEC, NASDAQ, and brokerage firms worldwide. No pressure…. 



If the company is not embracing Elegant Reasonism they have zero clue whether or not their pursuit efforts regarding leading edge technologies are red herrings or cogent opportunity. They must mode shift that opportunity to make that determination. 

The results of that systems review should be made available to management and reported to shareholders of record.



Early adopters across the competitive landscape represent high threat to existing IP portfolios and the most valuable will be low hanging fruit for interlopers to mode shift out from under laggards failing to recognize and embrace Elegant Reasonism.

Risks not seen kill weak companies. If you are not capable of perceiving the threat you have no clue what risks exist. Elegant Reasonism is the framework and epistemology to ferret out truth as a function of the unified Universe. You snooze you lose.

Any critical review of chart 10 in holistic context of Elegant Reasonism will result in critical situational awareness thinking insightful that any individual or business oblivious to Langer Epistemology Errors or their implications will stay hung up on the left hand side of that chart. There are several points therein. First that insights derived from the right hand side of that chart will never be realized by those so ensnared individuals or businesses. There are no mechanisms in status quo thinking to illuminate and illustrate the shackles constraining their thinking. For these reasons performing the necessary work associated with a systems review which enables net new insights from an existing, M1 or M2 basis, enabling or otherwise empowering the ability to mode shift that existing asset into alignment with the unified Universe could not otherwise be conducted absent insights derived from Elegant Reasonism as illustrated by the Decision Checkpoint Flowchart (chart 10) in this presentation. Consequently the mode shifted instance of that asset constitutes a net new idea, concept, or construct unique and distinct from the original and it is also a derivative of Elegant Reasonism.

Example Impact: 02 Legal Industry: You are a trial attorney of national renown. You depend on evidence and you specialize in fraud and defamation cases, including securities fraud. You might represent plaintiffs or defendants. The central issue in this case centers on what constitutes evidence, belief systems, and how they are rationalized and justified (e.g. what epistemology is). 

Elegant Reasonism constitutes an addition to the traditional epistemologies (e.g. Empiricism, Rationalism, Constructivism, ..., etc). 

Is a superset, over-arching, epistemology in so much as it may include the use of the traditional epistemologies as a part of its analysis.



Elegant Reasonism seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe. 

Holistic approach weights traditional epistemologies then subjects to intense analytic rigor and discipline such that evidence is mode shifted relative to the unified Universe.



It will be noted at trial that empiricism did not accomplish unification and those reasons will be splayed out for the jury. Then the question ‘why’ will be asked.



Bayesian analytics will be employed to weigh mode shifted evidence, in context of the unified Universe (using Elegant Reasonism), before, during, and after (e.g. in summation) for the jury.



Educate the jury on the implications of encapsulation, mode shifting, and the implications of Elegant Reasonism’s analytic stack in terms and context of unification relative to the evidence.



The jury will be taken through Elegant Reasonism phases into situational awareness delivered by fully compliant Treatise in summation.

Such a presentation or case would include detailed discussions of Susanne K Langer’s 1948 book Philosophy in a New Key and the nature of epistemological failure associated with mistaking an abstraction for reality. The area surrounding page 74 in that book provide critical insights connecting these various concepts now embodied in Elegant Reasonism.

Example Impact: 03 You are a change management leader and Six Sigma black belt. You have been charged with deployment of Elegant Reasonism for a large enterprise whose core mission is development of high technology. Many, if not most, of the scientists and engineers are entrenched in status quo thinking in full denial because of past personal successes. How are you going to enlighten them and gain their full support in order to conduct a comprehensive systems review and update the enterprise’s business plan? Essentially ask questions you know they can not answer using status quo thinking. Then lead them to the answers. 

Q: What do two slit experiments, a ‘glory’ (seen from aircraft), and the [Schr ӧdinger] wave function all have in common? A: The Fundamental Entanglement Function, Function, limited by Severance and that is a concept which requires unification to comprehend. Let’s mode shift that and explore along the way… 



Q: Show them the single cogent paragraph of The Emergence Model for M5. Then ask them to take a single sheet of paper out and write one paragraph down so that their own (status quo) thinking accomplishes unification and make them explain why it does. A: Don’t wait too long because they will never accomplish the task. Explain to them unification as a philosophical predicate priority consideration entering science. Then show them M1 core constructs illustrating the spacetime-mass interface precludes unification (nothing real can cross that interface), and that unification was never Einstein’s original intent. His intent was to explain the constancy of the speed of light and of time. Both of which can be attributed to Severance. 



Q: What does this have to do with business? A: Network glass fiber optics is one answer. Spectrum analysis is another. CPU component fabrication and infrastructure sets are another, including qubits. Another aspect are red herring identification (e.g. areas where we thought something was real when in fact it is a logic trap resulting from M1’s inability to accomplish unification). Let’s mode shift these areas and explore…

Point being the failure of status quo thinking requires out of the box thinking. Use the ‘three rows of three dots’ puzzle, but ask them about what inhibited resolution awareness when 1st encountered.

Q: What are the strategic implications of Einstein being logically correct? A: Situational awareness of the implications of Langer Epistemology Errors and Systems Engineering’s logical & physical views. Multiple logically correct views, and multiple physically correct views may exist for the same system. Exemplify atomic structure to illuminate & illustrate. 

Then tie it all together and discuss SOLREI’s Bang to Bang article. Why does unification mean it must also explain everything about who we really are and why we are in business in the first place? A: Human Action by Mises.

There are any number of simple examples. Chart 10 makes the point that if they can not present a model which closes to unification then they can’t even begin that decision checkpoint flow. Consequently they need to listen to what you have to say. ● Pick up any object. Ask the audience what it is. When someone replies go write that answer on a flip chart. Ask someone to provide another label for the same object. Repeat this several times until you have three or four different labels for the object. Then ask the audience which of those labels represents reality. Make the point that there are manners of contemplation where it is possible to have simultaneous logically correct reflections of reality. What Einstein created in 1905 and again in 1916 was a logically correct manner of thinking. Review these points from earlier presentations. Then point out that nothing real may transit the spacetime-mass interface without first conversion to energy. Then take them back to chart 10. Show them Einstein’s quote: “We can not solve problems using the same thinking we used when we created them.” Einstein was right again…. ● Then point out that this is an opportunity to leverage what it is we already know in mode shifting it into alignment with the unified Universe. Use Translation Matrices as a learning tool to illuminate those thoughts. Engage M5 and get them noodling on how it manifests simultaneous truth with the set of paradigms being investigated. Make a game or challenge out of it. Make it fun to work. Create a race to ‘ah ha!’ moments. 29

Example Impact: 04 You are the Research Director for a globally renowned R&D consortium. The Board of Directors have become aware of Elegant Reasonism and have asked you to justify new experiments costing billions in construction costs, human capital, and the implications and applications of the subsequent results. 

It should be quickly realized that status quo thinking can not accomplish unification. Consequently no presentation to such an organizational body can employ status quo thinking as its basis. (See charts 8, 9, & 10 herein.) 



Your only option (to stay employed) is to mode shift your experiment and articulate what changes are needed both to equipment, experimental premise, and human resources working the various problems. The subsequent results to reflect, with the highest affinity possible, the unified Universe.

Any competent scientist can reverse engineer M5’s cogent description for mode shifting purposes across Elegant Reasonism’s framework, framework, tools and rules in order to conduct any systems review. Make sure they comprehend implications of Langer Epistemology Errors and make sure not to make them feel bad (everyone else on Earth committed them too don’t forget). Leverage SOLREI’s resources to help, engage them if necessary.

When in science new insights become available it is necessary to conduct a systems review into what it is we think we know. Our original systems review is in the process of being brought online. Some of it is available in these various presentations. There is much work to do here but SOLREI is dedicated to short circuiting the time it took us so your audience does not have to consume that much time. Hopefully these presentations will help. It should be noted that what you see on these various charts took some 17 years of R&D work to realize. What you read in minutes took them years to build from scratch. Back then the puzzle pieces were scattered all over science and philosophy and in hundreds of different pieces of work from some of the most notable people in history. ● Creating a net new encapsulated interpretive model is not the same as conducting an investigation where one already exists (e.g. The Emergence Model exists). ● If you or your team is in a position, and possesses the resources, to pursue creation of a net new encapsulated interpretive model then the Elegant Reasonism framework and epistemology are here to help you get that done. In fact you may use The Emergence Model as a guide toward that end. In the interim, The Emergence Model exists. Use it. ● Leverage existing knowledge to complete Translation Matrices surrounding the known unknown areas under investigation. As you contemplate The Emergence Model it will become clear what needs doing. Our experience has been that such explorations provide many ‘Ah Ha!’ moments. Use these to your advantage.

Example Impact: 05 As an executive manager you must position your company relative to new technologies potentially influencing your decisions, including Quantum Computing (QC). You have to speak at your annual shareholder meeting and QC is a prevalent topic. What are the factors guiding your discussions? 1

Only The Emergence Model in context of Elegant Reasonism closes to unification (e.g. is fully compliant with the realm of c’s). There is nothing in status quo thinking that can even come close, including quantum computing (but the question is ‘why is that so’).

Nothing real can traverse the [M1/M2] spacetime-mass interface without it converting to energy as defined by those models. This same issue is why quantum gravity experiments fail (in M1/M2/M3).

100% of all quantum computers employ electrons/photons which have mass; therefore see No 2. NOTE: Most texts erroneously report photons, also used in some QC systems, do not have mass. The issue is that that photon mass is so infinitesimally small as to be irrelevant in the vast majority of calculations and so it is ignored. Photons have mass and therefore are subject to No 2. If photons did not have mass they could not exert pressure on spacecraft, which they do. Also, we can iterate M1/M2/M3 enumerated models to include cases where and how photons are treated but we must consider implications to E=mc 2 and to core constructs, as well as their fundamental relationships. Ultimately conclusions are essentially the same.

Quantum Bits (qBits) are a) ultimately based on electrons, b) probabilistic, c) have yet to predict lottery numbers picked by equally powerful QC systems, d) see No 2. Mode shifted such constructs are a function of The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance.

The Emergence Model in context of Elegant Reasonism reconciles 100% of all of these various issues. Mode shifting this discussion finds entanglement distance as a function of architectural mass as the source of probabilistic nature of superposition. Remember, in M5, The Fundamental Entanglement Function is limited by Severance. EFPS1 cascades determine when Severance occurs, and that is a function of the respective and relative architectures in the Event Frame.

Therefore we still chose option 3 on chart 7 of this presentation. Everytime we test Elegant Reasonism it only gets stronger. Our company sees Elegant Reasonism as the credible path forward.

Many involved in quantum computing are proverbially deep in the forest looking at trees. Have them take a deep breath and pause. Point out Langer Epistemology Errors. Then discuss simultaneous logical truths. Then cite, again, Einstein’s quote about problem solving and thinking anew. Then cite Susanne Langer’s quote about recognizing a new realm means asking a whole new world of questions. Get them to engage chart 10. Then discuss: ● Mode shift superposition to entanglement limited by severance as a logical exercise. • Remember to force participants to deal with the spacetime-mass interface as a function of their investigation. • Point out that in M5 ‘space’ is irrelevant. Force the team to invert their thinking away from the medium and onto what is in it. Deal with architectures of mass that are enabling entanglement limited by severance. See chart 10. Use the process. • Do not allow attempts to obfuscate with detail that does not fully compliant with the realm of c’s. Bring focus back to high level and stay on track. ● Discuss dismantling M1/M2 limitations by M5: • Point out that Severance is responsible for local emission velocities but dismantle the limitation barrier. Discuss the speed of entanglement and Bell Inequality experiments. • Point out that the inflationary theory’s rapid expansion falls apart when its corollary infinite compression can not be reconciled with Black Hole growth. That then vindicates Edwin Hubble’s red shift data which bolsters the local speed of entanglement experienced in Bell Inequality experiments. Inequities there likely being a product of Severance relative to and respective of Event architectures. ● Briefly bring up the discussion between IBM and Google regarding the maximum number of qBits deploy-able. IBM did what Google publicly said could not be done. The questions lay in the disparity of expectation and implementations to get it done.

Transformational Leadership Elegant Reasonism is poised to fundamentally redefine transformational leadership exactly because it enables and empowers leaders to perceive aspects of the unified Universe (and business therein) available in no other manner. Effective leadership will wield Elegant Reasonism transformationally.

At present, Elegant Reasonism should be considered ‘disruptive’ exactly because humanity has been committing Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs) for such a long time. People are vested in status quo thinking and institutionalized constructs. Many, if not most, people may feel threatened by what Elegant Reasonism represents. Others will manifest early adoption embracing its insights readily. Either way empathy must be stressed. ● Remember only the individual can affect their own paradigm shifts to ethical effect. All you can do is facilitate fodder allowing them to conduct that shift. Information effectively communicated is always under the control of the recipient and not the speaker. ● The objective is cognition to embrace in order to engage the unified Universe to positive effect. ● Elegant Reasonism represents an ability to articulate simultaneous truths but in context of (e.g. illuminated illustrations of) not just each other but the unified Universe. The more you contemplate this capability the more powerful recognition becomes. ● Many proverbial apple carts are upset by Elegant Reasonism and for a variety of reasons. Those vested in the status quo or institutionalized constructs may go to great lengths to both deny its capability and your introduction of it to audiences they may wish to influence. Leaders should be situationally aware of these issues. ● Be empathetic and sensitive to your relative and respective audiences ● Create and nurture situationally aware environments for all organizations ● Espouse truth as a function of the unified Universe 32

Markets The key to any market is its intrinsic source of value. Those who do not question that source are likely to find value in anything. Elegant Reasonism seeks truth (and value) from the unified Universe. Remember Elegant Reasonism is the framework and epistemology required to perceive and engage the unified Universe. Elegant Reasonism is the first new discipline of philosophy to appear in many years. Philosophy is carved into many discipline areas: of knowledge is epistemology, of being is ontology, of nature is science, and the derivation of value is axiology Elegant Reasonism is disruptive only as a function of status quo thinking. Free markets will mode shift value as a function of open competition, innovation, and insight development. Once markets pervasively embrace Elegant Reasonism and its framework and epistemology have normalized across the global economy it will not be perceived as disruptive. At that point hindsight will likely wonder perplexedly what took us so long. 

Market volatility in the near horizon will be a function of knowledge management exercised by the various enterprises relative to competition, investments, and the consumer base



Market horizons beyond 2100 will normalize as the global economy passes through EFPS6



Market volatility will drive resonant government action and that will influence its citizenry



The philosophical basis intrinsic to the entity (regardless how entity is defined) will determine the effectiveness of that entity’s ability to wield Elegant Reasonism within its sphere of influence relative to the Solar System’s economy

Normally new patents affect relatively narrow market niches. Never in history has a single patent affected or provided some degree of influence over every sector and niche without exception, until Elegant Reasonism was published on November 26th, 2020 by the USPTO. At that point the world’s perception was inflected. Civilization will take some time to come to grips with that tectonic shift in capability. Until the various factors normalize across all markets, globally, volatility will likely be an unknown to some degree.

The Unified Universe is Subtle The actual real Universe is unified whether we think of it that way or not and therein lay the strategic clue to unraveling its mysteries. We must always ask if our holistic thinking is unified. It is no secret but layered abstractions means key detail thrives beyond simplex thresholds of perception and we must drive deep in order to see as we look. We must expect the smallest details in the holistic whole, exactly because the unified Universe demands no less. The intrinsic nature of MBPs derives the most elemental processes; a build process limited by the opposite. The Fundamental Entanglement Function, Function, limited by Severance is responsible for all configurations of MBPs, which form everything real. Taken as a system, individual MBPs forming such configurations manifest systems of systems. When, following Knot Theory, discontinuous configurations, enable inorganic configurations into action, and organic matter emerges. Stepping back from all this, inverting it and looking back at the path we can find truth and value in what the Universe has provided us. Intellect enough to ferret out unseen insights. Properties and phenomena once shrouded in mystery are now simply known unknows to pursue with passion. The secret is that there is no secret. The unified Universe is an open book to those prepared to seek its truth. One must chose the correct path and see the light as you look. There are many metaphors here and that too is a story for another day. Nothing here is really new. How we chose to apply it, that is very new and very utilitarian. Where we take it is up to us and our progeny.

The unified Universe does not care what you think about it. However, there is a net new insight out of all this. SOLREI INC calls it Neural Network Reconfiguration by Programming (NNRP). Around the world there are leadership programs that meld psychology with leadership tactics to modify behavior in pursuit of excellence. World renowned universities deliver such programs as do motivational speakers. You may hear about Neural-Linguistic Programming (NLP) in researching these topics. NNRP happens naturally as a function of cognition of Elegant Reasonism. As individuals are empowered with increased critical situational aware thinking, they are also aligning their physical neural pathways. They are inherently executing NNRP. Their physical neural networks are also being mode shifted into alignment with the unified Universe. This is a pretty powerful and very subtle effect and affect. It changes your perceptions and your thinking is more in tune with reality. You will casually perceive distinctions that someone not versed in any of this is utterly oblivious to. It is very powerful, and that then demands great responsibility. Wield Elegant Reasonism wisely and without malace.

Futurism No one can predict future events; however, we can examine insights already determined through Elegant Reasonism and take stock and inventory of where we are as of YE 2020. Predominant action is immersed in status quo thinking at that time and early adoption of Elegant Reasonism is slowly building momentum in niche comprehension areas. Most are still working to comprehend the implications of Langer Epistemology Errors. Errors. Competitive carnage has yet to manifest . That volatility is yet to come. No financial index exists employing Elegant Reasonism adoption metrics relative to any market. No R&D has produced technologies as a result of such investigations, although red herrings are already evident. Shareholders are yet to perceive these situations much less the implications to their expected ROI. The longer denying management pushes back against adoption the less happy investors and consumers will be. Competition is likely going to be the catalyst driving adoption. Interlopers will scan patent portfolios for low hanging fruit, mode shift that IP and file as a new asset reflecting the unified Universe. Since those aspects of any given IP can not be perceived through status quo thinking, the mode shifted asset must be considered net new asset and therefore unique. Worldwide intellectual property organizations will be inundated with new filings both from existing asset owners scurrying to protect their portfolios and from competitor’s attacks. The legal industry will embrace Elegant Reasonism because that will be the only method available to assess evidence in any case. Market analysts will embrace the framework and epistemology because that is the only way to comprehend the dynamics playing out in front of them. Business management leadership, investors, stakeholders, shareholders, and ordinary people everywhere will be watching with great interest to make sure they understand the implications to them. All of these dynamics are dependent on individuals everywhere comprehending the implications of Elegant Reasonism.

Presenters are encouraged to be interactive with the audience here. Capture insights from the audience and allow them to interact as a function of each other as well. Employ advanced education techniques to maximize insight development.

Summary Elegant Reasonism is the framework and epistemology required to perceive and engage the unified Universe. The Universe is unified regardless of what humans think or don’t think, it doesn’t care. Business leadership should recognize immediately that accomplishing unification presents both opportunity and competitive threat to existing portfolios and business operations. That in turn represents a degree of market volatility as the global marketplace struggles to comprehend these implications. Being able to describe the entire Universe Bang to Bang necessarily creates conditions isotropic across the entire spectrum of constituents comprising the global marketplace. 

“We can not solve problems using the same thinking we used when we created them” Einstein



Elegant Reasonism only disrupts the status quo (e.g. old way of thinking).



The best competitive defense is a solid offense



Commercial licenses are only required if Elegant Reasonism is deployed in revenue generating operations of any kind



The general license covers simple comprehension of Elegant Reasonism and is in force so long as no revenue exchanges take place



Evidence Chains illuminate and illustrate mode shifted patterns



Langer Epistemology Errors will obfuscate reconciling status quo thinking to unification



Everything real is a system or system of systems therefore Systems Engineering is a vital skill



The Emergence Model essentially mode shifts The Standard Model of Particle Physics



Just because unification has been accomplished does not mean there is no more work to do...

Elegant Reasonism requires critical situational awareness thinking in order to maximize value derivation as a function of cognition of unification. Holistically the processes, by design, are self-clarifying. They will only improve precision and accuracy over time. Also holistically the global economy is about to be itself subjected to Elegant Reasonism and there is little anyone at this point can do to stop that. Civilization needs to recognize and embrace Elegant Reasonism as best it can and cope with the implications. Philosophy and science must march on, adapt, integrate, and learn, The big take away from Elegant Reasonism is an enhanced appreciation for the Earth and its biosphere. The importance of the biosphere’s health can not be understated. Planetary sciences need to take another very hard look at planetary water loss to space and consider that our planet has been replenished, eerily consistent with niche extinction cycles. The edge of the razor life on Earth walked to get to this point just got sharper. We are at the dawn of a new awakening and our perceptions only now tip toeing into the edge of unfathomable vastness.

This presentation is a complete internal review of the implications of The Elegance of Reason. From this presentation will come the external presentation version. The Elegance of Reason, ISBN 9780977229239. We need to be clear: this presentation was never intended to be about “a book”. It's was intended to be about the concepts developed by that manuscript, and the implications of those concepts relative to the business model of the SolREI Company. Once you've understood the concepts we developed – then you will begin to understand something of our analytic capabilities and general wherewithal. You will too likely know a great deal more than you think you do about a great many other issues. The least of which is starflight. NOTE: The speaker may want to relate the “Columbus' Egg” problem. Depends on the audience and the purpose of the presentation. The point isn't whether or not they see the final answer – it's that we figured it out in the first place and that's the value we bring to the table. We were the ones that figured that out before anyone else did and that's something they need to wrestle with. This isn't a discussion of “command”, it is a discussion of “Knowledge Management” within an engaged “Consulting” arena, to drive objectives of change, to leverage our current situation and circumstances to enable and empower an enduring future through strategic sustainability. The SolREI Company likes impossible challenges. We know that together – we can do this.