Elegant Reasonism, Part 01: Introduction and Overview with Notes by SOLREI

Elegant Reasonism A Brief Introduction & Overview Patent Pending 16405134

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any documents, files, or previous e-mail messages attached to it, constitute an electronic communication within the scope of the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 USCA 2510. This communication may contain nonpublic, confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the sole use of the designated recipient(s). The unlawful interception, use or disclosure of such information is strictly prohibited pursuant to 18 USCA 2511 and any applicable laws. If you are not the intended recipient, if you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. Life Space Matters is a registered trademark of SolREI, Inc. H2Orbit is a trademark of SolREI, Inc.

Talking points: ● Introduce yourself and the organization you represent. SolREI Publishing is wholly owned subsidiary of SOLREI, INC and only publishes material produced by the company. No solicitations accepted. ● SOLREI, INC recommends presenters query their audience. (Video presenters may want to skip this step. The intent is to circle back and confirm connection with the audience after the presentation.) • Employ a flip chart or other medium to capture responses • Ask audience about experience with: • Systems Engineering • Logical Views of Physical Systems • Logical Distinctions between multiple logically correct views representing the same physical system • Critical Thinking & Discrimination between abstractions • Langer Epistemology Errors • Why status quo thinking can not accomplish unification ● This presentation is • Part of a series of informal presentations (and videos) • Is intended to be a brief introduction and overview • Intended to facilitate deployment activities of Elegant Reasonism 1

Notice This presentation is hyperlinked to SolREI, Inc’s primary website. The links herein will resolve only for registered users there. Registration is free. Once users are logged into our website, all hyperlinks in this presentation will resolve to their relative and respective landing pages. All other users will receive a standardized message concerning restricted content and reminding them to register. Simply register and log in to bypass that restriction message. 

Visit https://www.solrei.co



Ask about eligibility for VIP status



Review this presentation and click highlighted links as appropriate

This presentation is online with the SOLREI, INC website identified on the chart. Talking points: ● This and other presentations are in the User Library of the website • ./web/usr/library/solrei/documents/presentations • This particular presentation is in the Elegant Reasonism folder ● Registered users may enjoy: • Free access to the user library containing • Biographical data, papers, and articles • Scientific data, papers, and articles • .. and more • Early access to insights and material still under development • Blogs & Newsletters as they come online

Abstract The United States Patent & Trademark Office has now published SOLREI, INC’s IP asset “Elegant “Elegant Reasonism” Reasonism” as a utility patent establishing an epistemology supported by a framework required to perceive and engage the unified Universe. Our patent includes the first fully compliant model closing to unification, The Emergence Model. Holistically this asset fully accomplishes unification in a definable, repeatable, and standards based manner consistent with industry approaches to quality assurance; and scientific principles, practices, and methods. Unification is a tapestry larger than any single discipline of science, and its criteria must holistically describe the unified Universe consistent with nature as a philosophical predicate priority consideration. Elegant Reasonism unites all aspects necessary to perceive and engage the unified Universe for the first time in human history. This presentation is intended to facilitate global deployment.

Talking points: ● SOLREI, INC is Florida corporation headquartered in West Palm Beach. ● Original incongruities inspired a more in depth research effort circa 2004. ● Circa 2006 an all out systems review was initiated. ● SOLREI, INC was formed in April, 2011 subsuming all associated materials ● Unification was first recognized circa 2012 ● Broader implications of unification took years to recognize. ●Unification is a tapestry a great deal larger than any single discipline of science consistent with nature and must be a philosophical predicate priority consideration. When you describe the unified Universe Bang to Bang you necessarily must describe everything else in the same contextual framework and epistemology. ● May 7th, 2019: SOLREI, INC culminated a period circa 2004 to this date by filing a utility patent application for the framework and epistemology which holistically the company calls: Elegant Reasonism. ● November 26th, 2020: the USPTO published Elegant Reasonism as an IP asset invented by Charles C McGowen assigned to SOLREI, INC. ● Included in the patent is the first encapsulated interpretive model which closes to unification which the company calls: The Emergence Model. The Emergence Model is essentially a mode shifted version of the Standard Model of Particle Physics and as such is a product of Elegant Reasonism. ● Elegant Reasonism holistically seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority.

Executive Overview Patent Pending 16405134 “Elegant Reasonism” is a process utility that quantifies and codifies systemic abstractions philosophically poised as fundamental foundational constructs, encapsulating them within interpretive models, and then juxtaposing a plurality of such models against an investigation’s paradigms of interest/nature in context of and compliance with the unified Universe for investigative purposes. This information is then subjected to intense scrutiny and analysis in order to develop insights documented in Treatise for comparison with the real unified Universe, which is always held litmus.

Talking points: ● This presentation is: • A description of what the patent is ● The presentation is NOT: • A quantitative analysis justifying Elegant Reasonism • A history of how the patent was developed • A justification of Elegant Reasonism vs other Epistemologies • A description of the systems review it took to develop the asset ● Elegant Reasonism is the epistemology and framework used to employ encapsulated interpretive models of the unified Universe in order to conduct systems review investigations or to develop net new encapsulated interpretive models. • The first encapsulated interpretive model is The Emergence Model; which is included in the Elegant Reasonism patent asset. • That model may be used as an example for other models or for systems review investigative purposes. • You are free to develop your own model so long as it closes to unification and is fully compliant with the realm of c’s. • Actual real reality is held litmus in order not to commit Langer Epistemology Errors. For this reason such models are said to reflect actual reality and are not considered descriptions of actual reality. That distinction matters. The intent of that rule, protects from commission of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs) and is therefore important to remember. We will discuss more on subsequent charts. 4

Deployment Considerations Elegant Reasonism is an epistemology supported by a framework holistically (e.g. the epistemology and its framework) must be viewed as disruptive to institutionalized thinking exactly because it re-positions status quo paradigms and assumptions relative to context of unification (e.g. the unified Universe). Consideration should be given to how Elegant Reasonism is to be deployed by leaders, managers, and key influencers. The SolREI company considers Elegant Reasonism something which should be deployed transformationally (e.g. via traditional transformational leadership methods and practices). This chart deck is intended to facilitate deployment. Elegant Reasonism: 

Mode Shifts status quo thinking into alignment with the unified Universe



Creates conditions of simultaneous truths, but illuminates unification alignment



Is an epistemology supported by an analytic framework measured with industry standard quality approaches  And where the metrics themselves must be mode shifted also



Demands situational awareness across its domain of discourse



Deployment of Elegant Reasonism is fundamentally transformational

No one should expect paradigms to shift overnight or with any single event. Behavior patters are not shifted so easily. Many will suffer stages of grief as they come to grips with (e.g. wrestle their internal paradigms) what Elegant Reasonism represents. ●The management challenge is getting teams to see their first success with Elegant Reasonism. Rational, science based belief systems demand evidence. Evidence traditionally means employment of Empiricism as an epistemology. What we now know is that empiricism at its core depends on human physiology and Langer Epistemology Errors automatically furnish the brain with abstractions obfuscating that evidence. What is required is a framework wielding analytics capable of penetrating that obfuscation. That was one design point of Elegant Reasonism. In that context Elegant Reasonism comes into its own as a net new epistemology whose truth is a function of the unified Universe and not human physiology. ● Be sensitive to, and situationally aware of, those in your audience who are vested in status quo factors and thinking. They may represent inhibitors to adoption and they may employ covert tactics to preserve the status quo. ● Epistemology may be a new word to many. It is a philosophy of knowledge; which means it studies how we know what we think we know. How we justify that knowledge and how we rationalize it. • The framework employed by Elegant Reasonism facilitates that justification and rationalization with specific rules defined and designed to seek truth as a function of the unified Universe. ● Leaders in any given area should deploy Elegant Reasonism transformationally (e.g. employing standard transformational leadership skills and techniques – see next chart). 5

Wield Transformationally Elegant Reasonism is poised to fundamentally redefine transformational leadership exactly because it enables and empowers leaders to perceive aspects of the unified Universe (and business therein) available in no other manner. Effective leadership will wield Elegant Reasonism transformationally.

At present, Elegant Reasonism should be considered ‘disruptive’ exactly because humanity has been committing Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs) for such a long time. People are vested in status quo thinking and institutionalized constructs. Many, if not most, people may feel threatened by what Elegant Reasonism represents. Others will manifest early adoption embracing its insights readily. Either way empathy must be stressed. ● Remember only the individual can affect their own paradigm shifts to ethical effect. All you can do is facilitate fodder allowing them to conduct that shift. Information effectively communicated is always under the control of the recipient and not the speaker. ● The objective is cognition to embrace in order to engage the unified Universe to positive effect. ● Elegant Reasonism represents an ability to articulate simultaneous truths but in context of (e.g. illuminated illustrations of) not just each other but the unified Universe. The more you contemplate this capability the more powerful recognition becomes. ● Many proverbial apple carts are upset by Elegant Reasonism and for a variety of reasons. Those vested in the status quo or institutionalized constructs may go to great lengths to both deny its capability and your introduction of it to audiences they may wish to influence. Leaders should be situationally aware of these issues. ● Be empathetic and sensitive to your relative and respective audiences ● Create and nurture situationally aware environments for all organizations ● Espouse truth as a function of the unified Universe 6

Why? 

Because predominant thinking does not, nor can it, accomplish unification. 



Because predominant thinking does not integrate the implications of Langer Epistemology Errors. Errors. 

Mistaking abstractions for reality is a fatal epistemological flaw in thinking. thinking.



Systems Engineering principles and practices must be integral

Because traditional epistemologies do not adequately take the fact that human physiology is holistically intrinsic to what must be philosophically defined as a predicate priority. 



The spacetime-mass interface precludes it. Nothing real can transit it.

Human physiology is the common denominator for all traditional epistemologies and is also their ‘Achilles heel’.

Because accomplishing unification requires a greater tapestry than any single discipline of science. 

Philosophy and its subsidiary disciplines, including science, must demand and require contemplation of unification as a predicate priority consideration.

Elegant Reasonism represents an epic shift in learning, thinking, behaving, and perceiving the realm in which we all exist. Fundamentally it recognizes the limitations of human physiology in being able to perceive real objects which exist at scales both below and above our own. Both the subatomic and cosmological scales integrate into Elegant Reasonism’s Event Frame of reference. The biggest noticeable distinction in perception is why things around us are true. Once you understand those insights you will see things differently, and think differently about them. ● What is important to comprehend is that status quo and institutionalized thinking do not just fail to accomplish unification – they will never accomplish unification exactly because their core construct preclude it. For this reason unification must be considered a philosophical predicate priority as one enters science – not after you get there, lest the chances for commission of Langer Epistemology Errors increase, maybe subtly/fatally ● Systems Engineering skills are vital here. Cognition that something can have a logically correct model yet remain physically different is an important concept to comprehend ● Human physiology is a common thread through all traditional epistemologies. Human physiology, as you will see, automatically furnishes the human brain abstractions in order to relate to the world around us and that inherently sets us all up for commission of Langer Epistemology Errors ● Once Elegant Reasonism became capable of describing the entire unified Universe Bang to Bang it became obvious that it must also hold other insights into every other discipline 7

Discerning Unification 

Problem: Problem: Abstractions



Challenge: Challenge: Human physiology inherently setup people to commit Langer Epistemology Errors because the CNS automatically furnishes our brains abstractions in order to cope with reality.



Alternatives: Alternatives: 1) Continue w/Status Quo, 2) Start All Over, 3) Embrace Elegant Reasonism



Choice: Choice: No 3.



Rationale: Rationale: 1) Leverages existing knowledge, 2) Preserves existing IP & Investements, 3) Illuminates the path forward



Next Steps: Steps: Embrace No 3



Owner: Owner: Each individual freely

The Flammarion wood carving circa 1888

The Flammarion engraving is a wood engraving by an unknown artist, so named because its first documented appearance is in Camille Flammarion's 1888 book L'atmosphère : météorologie populaire ("The Atmosphere: Popular Meteorology"). Here it is a good metaphor for attempting to discern reality. Talking points: ● Traditional science stereotypically employs the epistemology Empiricism in the consideration of evidence. The reasons are many but primarily so experimental data may be duplicated by other people. That is possible because all humans have the same experiential physiology. ● Elegant Reasonism is a net new epistemology which demands truth as a function of the unified Universe as a predicate priority consideration and in that context drives past limitations imposed by human physiology. Elegant Reasonism employs Empiricism as a subset epistemology. Bayesian analytics (and more) are employed to discern distinctions where precise discrimination is required. ● Abstractions are noted from the smallest constructs to the largest known to science and systemic relationships must be recognized in full context of unification and in compliance with Elegant Reasonism rules as well as the Realm of C’s (which we will talk about shortly). ● Commission of Langer Epistemology Errors ensnares one’s mind inside logic traps that can be insidiously subtle. For this reason the concept of unification must be a philosophical predicate priority consideration. Science must once again be recognized as the philosophy of nature but now with special requirements of equipment, methods, and processes. Modern practitioners often believe science distinct from philosophy rather than embracing its traditional/historic roots. 8

Layered Abstractions These are just potential M5 examples. The actual number of layers needs vetting by the international community at large. There are potentially 7 to 8 abstraction layers between humans and reality in this particular example. Core constructs (bottom) must systemically manifest in the highest order (top) constructs in order to meet closure requirements. Every abstraction tends to insulate and isolate higher ordered ideas from lower ordered details. Every layer introduces potential replicate of fading between lowest ordered detail and highest ordered idea.

Abstractions have a tendency insulate and isolate higher ordered ideas from lower ordered details. When we layer abstractions systemically we get into situations that geneticists would call ‘replicate of fading’ issues where errors or incongruities creep in. It does not take many layers of abstractions to completely obfuscate the source of such incongruous thinking. When that thinking is logically correct and civilization has had a great deal of success employing it then the challenge to ferret out the actual problem is only exacerbated. ● This table is only an example for illustrative purposes only. SOLREI, INC encourages the international community to come together to build an ISO sanctioned version. ● The intent of this table is to show systemic relationships between the smallest constructs and those of the largest order of complexities known to science. In this particular case it covers all configurations of MBPs comprising architectural mass from individual MBPs up to the most supermassive Black Hole known to science (and those theoretically possible under models complying with/conforming to unification rules). ● These examples are based on M5 from the company’s original systems review. It may be more appropriate to make such a table based on concepts which require mode shifting rather than a specific model. It may also be determined that both types of tables are needed. This particular table served the company’s original purpose but that may now be obsolete as it was originally created prior to accomplishing unification.

Implications of Why? Failure to recognize Langer Epistemology Errors leads directly to logic traps manifesting the erroneous belief that one is working directly with nature rather than abstractions of it and that is a fatal flaw in epistemology. Layered highly systemic abstractions leads to replicate of fading issues between higher ordered ideas and lower ordered detail, as well as a complete loss of situational awareness regarding these issues. (e.g. ideas are insulated and isolated from underlying detail). Therefore the solution must reconcile these issues!

Elegant Reasonism is a net new epistemology (e.g. philosophy of knowledge). But why does that matter? If status quo thinking is logically correct then what’s the big deal? So, what? ● Knowledge is justified, rationalized, consolidated, as a function of the specific epistemology employed by individuals worldwide. Simplistically, if that knowledge is not based on reality which closes to unification then it is not aligned with the unified Universe. • Commission of LEEs (e.g status quo/institutionalized thinking) means that there is some aspect of perception being missed or misunderstood. We can make that ubiquitous statement exactly because we know that thinking can not close to unification because its core constructs preclude it. We do not make the statement lightly. Nor is it a cavalier statement. The statement is based on hard cold facts and analysis. The simple fact is that nothing real can transition the spacetime-mass interface without first conversion to energy. • Elegant Reasonism seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe. That means evidence demands that truth above and beyond all others. The unified Universe reins supreme in all tests, what is malleable is our thinking about it. ● When we re-calibrate our thinking into Elegant Reasonism something else begins to happen. Something subtle. Many professionals and professors teach courses for leaders around the world based on Neuroscience combined with Leadership traits. MIT Sloan, Tony Robbins, and many others are quick examples. Elegant Reasonism calls such techniques Neural Network Reconfiguration by Programming (NNRP). What is distinct here is that NNRP aligns an individual’s CNS and Brodmann areas of the brain with the unified Universe. Your very being becomes aligned when you shift your paradigms such that they seek truth as a function of the unified Universe. This is important. This matters and it matters a great deal. ●We strongly suggest organizations to think through deployment across any organization or enterprise in context of these issues. They are neither trivial nor trite. 10

Elegant Reasonism Patent Pending 16405134 “Elegant Reasonism” is the framework and epistemology required to perceive and engage the unified Universe. The essential areas of Elegant Reasonism are: 

The Framework - the Processes & Methods empoyed



The Emergence Model - 1st encapsulated interpretive model to close to unification as a philosophical predicate priority



The Epistemology - the Philosophy of Knowledge seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe Let’s discuss what these concepts mean and their implications to what it is we think we already know

Elegant Reasonism is an epistemology supported by a framework that seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe and which produced the first fully compliant encapsulated interpretive model to so close; which we call The Emergence Model. For all intents and purposes The Emergence Model is a mode shifted version of The Standard Model of Particle Physics. Turning this around then we observe that The Emergence Model is a product of over a decade long systems review conducted in context of Elegant Reasonism. These few words describe and position the relationships between these various concepts, processes and tools relative to and respective of one another. ● A systems review is a dedicated investigation into what it is we think we know, but which integrates net new insights resulting from a science based effort. SOLREI, INC conducted such a review circa 2004 – through 2020. That review is ongoing, despite our application. ● Einstein famously said: “We can not solve problems using the same thinking we used when we created them.” He was more right than he knew. ● Please understand that the subsequent charts in this presentation are told from the perspective of hind-sight. Developing these insights took a huge amount of effort. Often in the face of denigrating rhetoric. Exactly because we understood the situation, we persevered. Filing the application was simply to preserve the body of work conducted to date. So let’s discuss each of these different areas of the asset so you might gain the precipice of unification and wield this epistemology yourself. 11

M5 Cogent Description The Emergence Model’s logical view (M5) logically draws its basis from Most Basic Particles (MBPs). MBPs are the quintessential integer, and it is through their “intrinsic nature” all other concepts are derived. It is the MBP in M5 which manifests the three dimensions associated with all real objects not space. M5 is centrally characterized by two processes so derived; “The Fundamental Entanglement Function” which is limited by the other, Severance. The Fundamental Entanglement Function, the ‘build’ process, entangles MBPs into all configurations of “architectural mass” generally envisioned to follow Knot Theory, including dark matter within any given Event Frame. Severance, as an independent process, is ‘the failure mode’ of any given configuration of MBPs and represents the limits of architectural mass to remain intact specifically due to the intrinsic nature of constituent MBPs. Space in M5 is dimensionless nothing. Force, all force, is the work instantiated through the Intrinsic Action of configurations of MBPs forming architectural mass. Architecture of relative and respective constructs so configured determines physical properties which manifest. Time is an “action displacement index” of the relative and respective architectural masses in the frame. Energy is the ability of relative and relevant architectural mass to do that work.

The Emergence Model is holistically comprised of two interpretive models which we will distinguish on subsequent charts from one another and explain why there are two of them. Right now just know they are M5 and M6. M6 is a later discussion. We will spend the majority of our time with M5 because that model has more precise language and capability. ● What you are reading here is the product of reverse engineering seventeen years of research effort. We did not sit down and just write this paragraph. ● The concept of the MBP along took some five years to evolve and develop, and that work continues to improve. ● The Emergence Model was provided as a part of the application filed by SOLREI INC exactly because Elegant Reasonism requires employment of at least one encapsulated interpretive model which closes to unification. Any critical review of this single paragraph illustrates and illuminates the hard cold fact that this description does in fact close to unification. • The task of mode shifting all other concepts may be undertaken using only this paragraph. The company continues to work to get content from our original systems review integrated into our website. Once that material is there it will be made available. ● The company is producing materials, like this presentation, to help others to comprehend and understand implications so that they do not have to commit to decades long efforts and can simply build on what we have already accomplished. SOLREI leadership can think of no greater satisfaction than to have others exploit these insights on behalf of civilization. 12

Framework Tools Translation Matrices Definitions

Pn1 ISO 9001 Unification Tool

Pn2 Pn3

Abstraction identification, Quantification, codification.

Pn4 Pn...

The Elegant Reasonism framework employs tools to document investigations and efforts. Definitions are captured in relational database tools which then populate something the company calls Translation Matrices. ● ISO 9001 Unification Tool • Is a relational database designed to capture abstracts and their relationships internal to encapsulated interpretive models. • ISO 9001 is the international standard process for Quality Management Systems (QMS) standards. (See iso.org for QMS details). ● Translation Matrices • Are three dimensional matrices • This particular view is a top down view of what the company calls the 2D Articulation Layer. • Columns here represent: • Paradigms of interest/nature being investigated • Encapsulated Interpretive Models employed by any given investigation. • Rows represent: • How each encapsulated interpretive model manifests each paradigm under investigation. • Models may then be juxtaposed not only against the set of paradigms being investigated but relative to and respective of each other. Remember, at least one model employed must close to unification.

Encapsulated Interpretive Models

CONTEXT

Columns

As of 4Q2019 there were seven (7) recognized Encapsulated Interpretive Models: M0: Newtonian M1: Modern variant mass

Pn1

M2: Einstein’s Invariant Mass

Pn2

M3: PV of M1 or M2

Pn3

M4: M5 emulating M1 or M2 M5: LV of The Emergence Model M6: PV of The Emergence Model

Pn4 Pn ...

M7: Reserved

Elegant Reasonism recognizes a number of encapsulated interpretive models. Each of these model names listed here, are in the PDF presentation file linked back to a more descriptive page inside the company’s website. ● Systems Engineering principles and practices hold infrastructures have essentially two types of views, one logical and one physical. Exacerbating these issues is the erroneous belief that one is dealing directly with reality’s physicality rather than abstractions of it. That situation we now know constitutes Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs). ● Once we struggle and comprehend that both M1 & M2 are in fact logical views, we can be somewhat comfortable knowing: • M5 is also a logical view • That a physical view for the Emergence Model does in fact exist and it is referred to as M6 but investigations there are on going, extensive, and beyond current capability. We need greater computing power, R&D, and experimental technologies to explore all of these models. ● M7 is reserved due to an early error on the company’s part. We erroneously believed that Einstein thought mass was variant. That idea is false. He believed nothing of the sort. Rather than go back through the body of work we simply denoted M3 as the physical view of either M1 or M2 and retained the labeling. Civilization can decide later if it wants to rename everything and rebuild the associated body of work.

Encapsulated Interpretive Models Rows Paradigms of interest or or nature. Each row must be explicitly declared (e.g. made manifest by the rules of that particular relative and respective encapsulated interpretive model. Systemic paradigms are included to assure the integrity of a given investigation. The User Library on SolREI.co is an extremely good reference source for historical research. Today registered users have free access to that material. Each intersecting cell must manifest 100% of the relative and respective paradigm and to the extent it involves others they must be referenced for complete pattern recognition.

Pn1 Pn2 Pn3 Pn4 Pn ...

Systems reviews are investigations into what it is we think we know today. Elegant Reasonism is employed to mode shift that knowledge across various encapsulated interpretive models. We accomplish that by collecting abstractions employed by the selected sets of such models and then instantiating how each model makes each manifest. Juxtaposing them in this way allows us to perform analysis that is rigorous, both deep and broad, across all domains of discourse. Talking points are: ● Paradigms of interest or of nature ● Instantiate linkage points for Evidence Chains three dimensionally ● Encapsulation of each model precludes being able to reference one model from within another in any direction in this layer. All paradigm manifestations are exclusive to each such model. • Model to Model comparisons are made in subsequent analytic layering associated with Translation Matrices (subsequent charts). ● Systemic patterns between concepts within each model must be: • declared • As compliant with Elegant Reasonism rules, the realm of c’s, and other criteria as appropriate and as is possible. All inconsistencies must be fully documented consistent with industry QMS standards.

Enabling Mode Shifting Translation Matrices – Top 2D Articulation Layer Definitions

Pn1 ISO 9001 Unification Tool

Pn2 Pn3

Abstraction identification, Quantification, codification.

Pn4 Pn ... Paradigms Mode Shifted Model to Model

All definitions must be declared by investigators consistent with ISO 9001 QMS standards. You may use our database tool, which is available free from the company website software library online, or you may create your own tool so long as it meets the same design standards. ● Enumerated encapsulated interpretive models must be completely declared. Completely means 100%. Enumerated models may be iterated once declared but not changed. Any change constitutes a requirement to iterate that instance of that model. The team using the tool must all use the same tool and the same instance of the data set in order to assure integrity associated with all communications. ● All communications must declare the enumerated instance of the encapsulated interpretive model responsible for all phenomena, properties, interactions, for any given situation or scenario. • An example might be describing mass under relativistic conditions between M1 and M2. In one case intrinsic mass may hold answers to momentum, for example, and in the other model changes in that aspect must be dealt with differently and the associated patterns and relationships fully described. • Another example might be assignment of a variable to some concept. M1 & M2, for example, assign the variable ‘c’ to the speed of light. M5 assigns it to Severance. Manifestation of velocity may be the same but the reasons a given paradigm may be true is completely different as are the associated patterns described by the models employed.

Analytic Framework Layering 2D Articulation

Definitions

Context & Source Model Integrity Analysis M2M ↔ Paradigms

ISO 9001 Unification Tool

Paradigm Statistics Logic Calculus Reality Validation

Abstraction identification, Quantification, codification.

Bayesian Analytics Heuristics Metacognitive Analytics Six Sigma

Everything discussed on the previous chart is in the top layer here and made available for analytic rigor. Assumptions, logic, and even belief systems associated with given patterns and paradigms are all made available to the analytic stack. ● Each layer in the PDF presentation is hyperlinked to its respective description page in the company’s website. ● Remember that paradigms internal to a given model are not allowed to penetrate model boundaries. Model to model comparisons are done in the appropriate layers here. • There is a consequence to ISO QMS rules here in the sense that metrics and methodologies must, in some cases like Six Sigma, mode shifted twice. Once internal to the model, and then again holistically across all Translation Matrices employed by a given investigation. This would also be true of Bayesian Analytics and others as well. ● Remember that Translation Matrices are not required to complete all of this detail. They may be employed, and the company encourages you to do so, as simply as possible. Fully documented investigations are rarely required. The point of all this description is to illustrate that we can employ this detail if the situation requires it. Most investigations will likely use simple whiteboards or a piece of notebook paper to articulate a point.

The Framework Elegant Reasonism can be thought of as a framework needing to be populated by a given investigation employing rigor, discipline, and techniques employed by enterprise worldwide. The generalized process flow is broken down into these three areas on the next slide. Recognize – We must first comprehend the problem or challenge Illuminate – We must then illuminate all aspects of the investigation Analyze – We may then perform a holistic analysis seeking insights Only then may we Develop a Treatise that culminates in alignment with the unified Universe. The product Treatise is so aligned.

Elegant Reasonism’s framework employs essentially three phases: Recognize, Illuminate, and Analyze. Development of a holistic Treatise is crafted in full compliance and alignment with the unified Universe as a function of that analysis. Langer Epistemology Errors have been obfuscating the path forward for centuries. They occur when we mistake abstractions for actual reality. Systems Engineering principles allow us to employ logical views of physical systems. What Albert Einstein created with his papers was a logically correct construct, but it will never close to unification. It will not because its core constructs conspire to preclude that accomplishment.

Everything discussed on the previous chart is in the top layer here and made available for analytic rigor. Assumptions, logic, and even belief systems associated with given patterns and paradigms are all made available to the analytic stack. ● There are a number of decisions needing to be made assessing the status of any given investigation consistent with ISO 9001 QMS standards and guidelines. The next chart illustrates the decision checkpoint flowchart. Here we simply describe the general activities associated with each phase of an investigation. ● Many of the details behind each bullet point here are found externally to Elegant Reasonism as they are industry standard quality processes or business process re-engineering defined. All are essentially grounded in scientific principles and practices. Remember, empiricism is here considered a subset epistemology. ● Also note that we must be able to mode shift not just the domain of discourse being investigated but the metrics and QMS standards as well. It serves no purpose if the metrics are mired in thinking that can not close to unification. We must listen to what the unified Universe is telling us through core messaging (Note: The phrase ‘core messaging’ here is fully consistent with marketing management principles and business communications.)

Process Decision Checkpoints Unified Thinking?

Yes

Recognition

Illumination

Analysis

No No

Abstraction Inventory

Langer Yes Epistemology Errors?

Working with Abstractions or Reality? Reality

Mode Shift Effectively? Yes

Yes

No Develop Holistic Insights

Yes Abstractions

You are likely committing Langer Epistemology Errors

Realm of C’s Compliant?

Translation Matrices Effective? No Improve

No Investigation Effective? Yes

Unified Treatise

Everything discussed on the previous chart is in the top layer here and made available for analytic rigor. Assumptions, logic, and even belief systems associated with given patterns and paradigms are all made available to the analytic stack. ● Do not confuse this chart with the preceding generalized process flow. ● “Unified Thinking” is equivalent to asking “Can you unify physics or your thinking such that you can link everything in the known unified Universe?” ● Inventorying abstractions is not constrained to a particular encapsulated interpretive model, it is a holistic statement that requires all abstractions to be documented consistent with ISO QMS standards. ● If you believe you are working directly with reality then you are very likely committing Langer Epistemology Errors. Read Philosophy in a New Key, by Susanne K Langer, 1948. Pay especial attention in the text areas around page 74. (Click to read the entire book.) Such beliefs will ensnare and otherwise trap individual’s thinking to the left hand side of this chart. Elegant Reasonism gets you out of that trap and demands truth as a function of the unified Universe.

The Emergence Model The Emergence Model of Particle Physics is essentially a ‘mode ‘mode shifted’ shifted’ version of the Standard Model of Particle Physics. But what does that mean? Elegant Reasonism requires and demands that closure to unification is accomplished as a philosophical predicate priority. Consequently, the constructs of this model all exist within those rules and requirements. 

Everything real has mass as a function of complex composite architectures of configurations of Most Basic Particles or MBPs



Everything real is a system or system of systems



This and all models have two views, one logical and one physical, consistent with Systems Engineering principles and practices  M5 is the logical view, 

M6 is its physical view

The Emergence Model of Particle Physics may be considered a mode shifted version of The Standard Model of Particle Physics and it is holistically comprised of two views: M5 the logical view, and M6 the physical view. Since there are almost always more than one way to accomplish something physically and because logical inputs and outputs must be precisely defined, we naturally gravitate toward M5 rather than M6 given the nascent development circa 2010 – 2020. While we may speak of one view or another as ‘the Emergence Model’ we must never forget that the actual model is the holistic composition of both views and they must support one another, or both are broken. ● The Emergence Model is the first encapsulated interpretive model to be fully compliant with the realm of c’s. ● The proverbial 800 lb gorilla in the room centers on ‘architectures of mass’. Another construct relegated to philosophy is the source of MBPs. They constitute a known unknown to The Emergence Model and ultimately distill Thought Experiment 0004: Something vs Nothing. Related topics are linked from TE0004 on the website. ● It should be noted that traditional thinking has similar 800 lb gorillas and they consume theoretical astrophysics. • Geometric source of spacetime and the ultimate geometric map • Why traditional mathematics fails below the Event Horizon of a black hole (e.g. why it is called a singularity in the first place). • What is the intrinsic nature of spacetime as a ‘real’ construct which manifests its fundamental character and what distinguishes it from the historical luminiferous aether. 21

The Epistemology Elegant Reasonism as an epistemology seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe. While it necessarily integrates traditional epistemologies within the framework, it holds their congruence as a function of the holistic truth represented by the unified Universe. The framework integrates Bayesian analytics to map and sort out these various factors. These same approaches make manifest education road maps for mode shifting various belief systems into alignment with the unified Universe. As an epistemology Elegant Reasonism becomes a superset of traditional philosophies of knowledge under this definition. The ultimate arbiter of truth being the actual real unified Universe which is always held litmus.

The Emergence Model of Particle Physics may be considered a mode shifted version of The Standard Model of Particle Physics and it is holistically comprised of two views: M5 the logical view, and M6 the physical view. Since there are almost always more than one way to accomplish something physically and because logical inputs and outputs must be precisely defined, we naturally gravitate toward M5 rather than M6 given the nascent development circa 2010 – 2020. While we may speak of one view or another as ‘the Emergence Model’ we must never forget that the actual model is the holistic composition of both views and they must support one another, or both are broken. ● As an epistemology Elegant Reasonism seeks truth as a philosophical predicate priority consideration and function of the unified Universe. ● To that end it employs traditional epistemologies as adjunct subsets to qualify, quantify, justify, and rationalize what ultimately constitutes evidence which holistically must be fully compliant with the realm of c’s. ● Remember too that the framework must employ at least one encapsulated interpretive model which closes to unification. ● Also remember that encapsulated interpretive models are said to reflect the unified Universe, not directly describe it. This in order to minimize and eliminate the potential commission of Langer Epistemology Errors.

QMS Standards Quality Management Systems 

ISO Family of Standards



ISO 9001 QMS



Six Sigma 

Sigma Defects



Sigma Values



Context Reorientation



Malcolm Balridge National Quality Framework



Root Cause Analysis



Why questions



Thinking Hats

There are aspects achieved within encapsulated interpretive models and there are too critical insights arising from holistic analysis.

Encapsulation 



What is not obvious in employing these standards is their existence within the Elegant Reasonism framework and epistemology influences their relative and respective application.

Quantification, codification, of abstractions

Epistemology Linkage

Incessantly demanding alignment with unification criteria changes the tone and manner of QMS standards.

We are not getting into ISO 9001 QMS standards in any depth here because that information is available from the ISO.org website and defined elsewhere. What we want to impart here is how those standards relate to Elegant Reasonism. ● ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems Standards is a family of quality management processes internationally defined, but they are not the only quality process in use across industry. ● Elegant Reasonism requires elimination of Langer Epistemology Errors and that requirement demands an inventory of abstractions be maintained by any given investigation. Abstractions must be quantified and codified by encapsulated interpretive model enumeration and iteration as employed by the investigative team. One can not eliminate something not codified. If it is not codified, then it also likely can not reflect accurate Sigma Defects in employed thinking. Such scenarios then distort or pervert Six Sigma by placing blinders up preventing perception of such real Sigma Defects. And it is this generalized scenario which illuminates and illustrates mechanisms which manifest the logic traps that have ensnared humanity for over a millennium. That insight is the essential justification for Elegant Reasonism as a net new epistemology.

Bodies of Work / People 



The website employed by SolREI SolREI contains a comprehensive User Library and maintains an Acknowledgments page which together represent the primary set of materials reviewed during our systems review circa 2004 – 2019.

Albert Einstein 

Special Relativity



General Relativity



“We can not solve problems using the same thinking we used when we created them” them”



“If you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree it will live its life believing it is stupid” stupid”



Access to this material is reserved for registered users of our system for positive authentication and non-repudiation purposes.



The User Library contains public domain information but imposes a Collected Works copyright.



Web design is intended to be available for backlink cross reference as exemplified by this presentation (e.g. the links on this page).

Susanne K Langer 

Philosophy and its taxonomy



Langer Epistemology Errors



Mistaking abstractions for reality is a fatal flaw in epistemology

Lev B Okun 

The Concept of Mass



Foundation Distinguishing M1 & M2



“Einstein did not believe mass was variant” variant”

The company website has a more complete Acknowledgments page, but here we focus on three key individuals whose contributions were essential in the development of Elegant Reasonism. It should be noted that unification would almost certainly not have been accomplished absent the Internet and the willingness of others to share information. In alphabetical order key influencers are: ● Albert Einstein - While General and Special Relativity are central contributions, so too were his insights and discussions surrounding their inspiration. Specifically discussions earlier concerning the luminiferous aether as well as his letter to Lincoln Barnett concerning how to consider mass. ● Susanne K Langer Historically, Charles C McGowen recognized the same epistemology errors noted by Langer during the original systems review. He could not accept he was the first to note such errors and in performing research discovered Langer’s 1948 work. He named the errors after her to honor who she was and her body of work. Candidly he was relieved because she articulated the issues with a great deal more eloquence than he ever could and that is a view he holds to this day. Ironically one of the central issues allowing the accomplishment of unification was appreciation of art, which was Langer’s motive and area of focus at the time. Equally ironic is that her work also provides linkage and Evidence Chains from the core constructs of The Emergence Model, through inorganic/organic, through biology, through Brodmann Areas and their relationship to the CNS in humans which links this domain of discourse back to the unified Universe. ● Lev B Okun was a Russian particle physicist by training and profession, but he also was concerned with education and content detail. He was singularly focused on historical accuracy and the source of perceptions. His article “The Concept of Mass” was central to the insights which separated M1 from M2 resulting in the encapsulated interpretive model taxonomy illustrated on Chart 14 of this presentation. 24

SOLREI INC never found any evidence that Einstein ever met Langer or she him, and despite that their lives overlapped. Had they met and discussed at length their relative and respective philosophies, McGowen believes Einstein would have developed Elegant Reasonism himself at that time or subsequent to it. He minimally would have laid down the same foundations. Only chance put the development of Elegant Reasonism into McGowen’s sphere of endeavor. ● Another quote from Einstein is: “If you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its life believing it is stupid”. The point of this quote has to do with ‘detail sets’ within a given epistemology. If an individual’s detail set is in domain A, but a discussion or capability requires elements from domain B, then it is non-sequitur to judge that individual on their ability to wield any other detail set than the one they are familial with. Conversely individuals familial with a particular detail set should not assume that they can not engage beyond that limit if they so desire and are willing to persevere to acquire an ability to wield them. ● Yet another quote from Einstein: “If you can not explain something simply enough, then you do not understand it well enough”. Despite all of the successes of Relativity, it does not, nor can it, accomplish unification. The reason that is true is fundamentally unification is not the problem he sought to solve when he created it. Relativity is a logically correct encapsulated interpretive model, and therein lay the strategic clue to reconciling unification.

For McGowen, it took Dr. Lev B Okun’s article entitled The Concept of Mass before he comprehended the implications of distinctions between how Einstein is popularly perceived and what he actually believed. McGowen will leave to historical sociological/anthropological scholars pursuit of why and how that came to be so prevalent and predominant sociologically. That is not our concern here. Here we simply note what he believed based on his own words and writings. ● Albert Einstein - did not believe mass was variant. Anyone claiming otherwise is not familiar with history. ● Modern predominant (e.g. status quo) thinking does believe that mass is variant, yet they attribute such beliefs to Einstein (which is patently false). ● The distinctions between how mass is treated within an encapsulation were determined by McGowen to be great enough to warrant an enumeration of models rather than an iteration of what had been employed as M1. Consequently that is the central distinction between M1 and M2. ● It should also be strategically noted here that when The Emergence Model (e.g. holistic view of M5 & M6) dismantle velocities associated with M1, M2, and M3 what is realized is that cosmological velocities are mode shifted toward something called Rapidity. Rapidity is defined as v/c, where velocity v is over what is defined traditionally as the speed of light c. That variable c in The Emergence Model is mode shifted to mean Severance. Consequently when we look back at what Einstein originally wrote we realize he is using Rapidity squared in his equations and he is inherently integrating Severance into his discussions. He was so close to the truth. So close. Read properly then Rapidity is velocity over Severance; which then explains too EFPS1 cascades and why interferometer experiments report evidence as they do. It also reconciles Edwin Hubble’s data with experimental evidence throughout history. And this insight reconciles cosmological z-factors and eliminates the inflationary theory. The unified Universe is 26 unfathomably ancient and larger than our particle horizon.

Susanne K Langer is the first American woman to be recognized both popularly and professionally as a philosopher. Her 1948 work captured with eloquence the circumstances and implications of mistaking abstractions for reality. Langer Epistemology Errors are as a result named in her honor. ● These concepts are redefining the science of Knowledge Management in context of Elegant Reasonism. ● They are central to Elegant Reasonism epistemologically. ● These concepts are vital to review of evidence chain linkages epistemologically across Translation Matrices analytical rigor and discipline. ● They are central to comprehend relative to effectiveness of mode shifting through the generalized process flow and the consequential decision checkpoints that one ultimately must encounter on their way to developing a holistic Treatise fully compliant with the unified Universe.

Behind The General Processes 

Recognition Awareness 

You can not fix it if you do not know it is broken and



You must recognize how it is broken (e.g. in what manner is it broken)

 



The SolREI ISO 9001 Unification Tool is purposed to quantify and codify abstractions employed by each of the seven recognized encapsulated interpretive models and derivations thereof.



Communications only occurs when there is a common comprehension. The challenge here is that encapsulated interpretive models establish fundamental foundational context. Only through mode shifting concepts model to model assures effective communications.



Effective use of QMS standards assures the integrity of abstraction quantification, codification and usage.



Objectives must be situationally aware….

Implications Defining what is needed, why, and for what purpose

Systems Engineering 

Everything real is a system or system of systems



Logical views of physical systems

Quality Management Systems 



Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs) (LEEs) are common in almost every aspect human life. They represent a particular problem to all aspects of science and engineering acumen

Requirements Specification 



Every step and stage

Investigation Objectives, Goals, and approach

A deployment consideration for integrating Elegant Reasonism across any enterprise are elements necessary to manifest effective situational awareness. Effective leaders will conduct themselves transformationally consistent with chart 6 in this presentation. One must recognize that something is broken before it can be fixed and the challenge presented humanity circa 2020 is that state of brokenness has been obfuscated by a plethora of committed Langer Epistemology Errors. Consequently we must ask that central question in the top left corner of chart 20 in this presentation: Can you unify physics? It is a yes or no question. The thinking behind M1, M2 or M3 is a resounding ‘no’. That answer is no exactly because the core constructs encapsulating those models is incapable of unification as a philosophical predicate priority consideration. Nothing real can transit the spacetime-mass interface. It’s just that simple. The Emergence Model does not have that problem because those constructs are not employed there at all. Thus the problem is eliminated completely See cogent description of M5 on chart 12. Situational awareness in full context of Elegant Reasonism also fully compliant with the realm of c’s is difficult and requires a multidisciplinary approach to acquire. It is not simple and requires honest internal reflection of belief systems coupled with a willingness to dynamically affect paradigm shifts as required. This is something many people struggle with and is a subject demanding great empathy for transformational leaders. 28

Practices 



Recognize 

Quantify



Codify



Encapsulate



Enumerate



Iterate

Illuminate 

Illustrate CONTEXT



Enable “mode shifting” in tools



Empower the team



Practices overall objective is to maintain situational awareness at every single step and stage of an investigation without exception



Remember the objective of the tool is to enable and empower situational awareness by credibly mode shifting fundamental context that is the basis for subsequent interpretation



Detailed specifications and their relative and respective interpretations must be quantified and codified consistent with QMS standards of Elegant Reasonism (e.g. holistically).



Langer Epistemology Errors must be carefully documented at all levels paying particular attention to systemic relationships.



Analysis should be conducted in a situationally aware context cognizant of Bayesian analytics employed by the framework



Final Treatise is holistically synergistic across all analytics employed by the investigation

Analyze 

Integrate tool analysis maintaining situational awareness



Maintain unification criteria as a predicate priority consideration



Assure integrity of critical thinking

Elegant Reasonism practices are the generalized actions taken during each phase of an investigation as we work toward a unified Treatise. The generalized process flow shown on chart 19 illustrates the high level activities. The decision checkpoint flow chart 20 highlights considerations determining generalized effectiveness. ● Recognize • Here we must recognize not just the problem being investigated but the abstractions typically employed. We must then inventory those abstractions by encapsulated interpretive model and iterate them within models if necessary. • Every abstraction employed reflection what is considered a real construct must be uniquely identified. • It should be noted that in context of chart 9 a problem may be perceived at complexity order 6 but be made manifest at some other complexity level. All associated abstractions must be recognized systemically ● Illuminate • Illumination stereotypically occurs as a function of populating Translation Matrices and its associated analytic stack. What manifests itself here to investigators is how context is made manifest by each encapsulated interpretive model. This activity enables and empowers mode shifting. ● Analyze • The analyze phase is often the trickiest phase if for no other reason than recognition that metrics measuring effectiveness and insights may also need mode shifting. Leave no stone unturned. Inspect every niche of Translation Matrices, their cells, their layering and external definitions for items needing mode shifting. Simplistically: maintain your situational awareness all the way to Treatise 29

Philosophy 



Philosophy



Investigators must be fully cognizant of the difficulties associated with recognition of LEEs in modern society as well as paradigm shifts demanded by mode shifted situations.



Science is a specialized branch of philosophy requiring specific methods, practices, and epistemology



Epistemology is the philosophical study of knowledge; its basis, justification, belief systems, etc.



Denial



Ontology is the philosophical state of being



Anger



Axiology is the philosophical study of value derivation



Bargaining



Depression



Acceptance



Taxonomy recognition is required in order to realize the relevant relative position of the criteria, especially systemic criteria, required in order to achieve and accomplish unification. 



Unification criteria must be recognized as a philosophical predicate priority considerations The actual real Universe is unified whether or not your thinking about it is.



Stages of grief associated with letting go of long held belief systems is likely in full play

Everyone on Earth expected unification to come from a different source. There will be a great deal of angst over everything associated with Elegant Reasonism.

Ultimate truth as a function of the unified Universe is powerful, undeniable, and tends to be self-clarifying.

Elegant Reasonism is a philosophy of knowledge, an Epistemology, supported by a framework seeking truth as a function of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority consideration. Considered in this way we must also redefine the philosophy of value derivation (e.g. axiology). Holistically Elegant Reasonism comes into its own as a powerful epistemology when the basis, justification, rationalization, and belief systems are all holistically a function of the unified Universe. It changes the perception of what you see when you look. ● Philosophy • Science is the philosophy of nature employing specialized methods, equipment, and processes. Employed in context of Elegant Reasonism science become a powerful tool to investigate the unified Universe. ● We would all do well to remember that the moment Einstein submitted his papers in 1905 he was not employed as a scientist. He was employed as a patent clerk in Bern, Switzerland. Technically when McGowen developed Elegant Reasonism he was employed as a Realtor and a Mortgage Broker. Neither of these situations belies the underlying skill set nor body of learning of either man. • Einstein is quoted as saying: “If you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its life believing it is stupid.” The point is we should never judge capability arbitrary expectations. We must maintain complete situational awareness in every case.

Truth from the Unified Universe 

The unified Universe exemplifies 

Axiology – Philosophical study of value derivation  Insights that illuminate aspects of the unified Universe illustrate evidence chains manifesting greater value



Epistemology – Philosophy of Knowledge 



Ontology – Philosophy of Being 



Elegant Reasonism is an epistemology which seeks justification for, rationalization of, and belief systems that are a function of the unified Universe. Such an epistemology, transformationally wielded is powerful and with great power comes great responsibility. The Emergence Model (e.g. holistic view of M5 & M6) intrinsically employ the Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance. The point here concerns ‘connections’, and ‘connectedness’ in and between everything real.

The Elegant Reasonism framework supporting its epistemology manifests axiology through Human Action in order to deliver a strong sense of ontology by seeking truth as a function of the unified Universe. Elegant Reasonism inherantly integrates Susanne K Langer’s Philosophy in a New Key demanding clear situational awareness.

There is an interesting aspect of Elegant Reasonism that is exceptionally subtle and it comes to us through contextual ontology in the form of NNRP. The acronym means Neural Network Reconfiguration by Programming When we look at central nervous systems (CNS) and its various connections to the human brain, and each of the various Brodmann Areas we find that repeated actions will reconfigure neural pathways. Changing attitudes will modify behavior for these reasons. The brain exhibits neural plasticity for these reasons. ● Employing Elegant Reasonism intrinsically employs NNRP to all embracing it; which inherently increases those individuals situational awareness consistent with the unified Universe. ● Individuals who intrinsically embrace Elegant Reasonism will derive value from the global economy fundamentally different than those who do not. ● Investors who embrace Elegant Reasonism will redefine volatility in the marketplace consistent with the unified Universe across all value chains and niches. ● Vision, goals, and objectives will be redefined in context of Elegant Reasonism and the implications we recognize because of it. Elegant Reasonism will fundamentally change perceptions of what we see as we look.

Elegant Reasonism Epistemology Elegant Reasonism is an Epistemology employing a framework seeking truth as a function of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority consideration. Traditional epistemologies are employed as statistically weighted subsets as a function of the degree to which they conform to the realm of c’s. c’s. 

Elegant Reasonism practioners are situationally aware of whether or not truth being presented is a function of the unified Universe. They incessantly seek that truth as a philosophical predicate priority consideration in everything they do.



Requires full compliance with The Framework, Framework, Rules, Tools&Technology, Tools&Technology, Standards, Standards, and principles



Alignment means holistic congruence with the body of work reflecting the unified Universe. Evidence Chains provide clear linkage across and between domains of discourse.



Realigns effectiveness metrics, ISO 9001 QMS Standards, Standards, Six Sigma and more across a plurality of encapsulated interpretive models

Philosophy of Science  Science is a specialized branch of philosophy

employing methods and tools used to describe nature in an independently repeatable manner holistically in context of the unified Universe.  The Universe is unified regardless of how we think about it. We need only to observe that it works to make this self-evident conclusion.

The presenter is encouraged to espouse personal reflections regarding their own illumination to these facts. Relate relevant paradigm shifts. Historical anecdotes may be useful. ● Science is a modern term. Historically it was referred to as ‘the philosophy of nature’. We must never forget those roots. ● The Universe does not care whether or not you recognize it or its nature. However, the more you recognize our connectedness to what is, the more you become part of that holistic whole.

Tools 

ISO Family Documentation Instruments 



Root Cause Documentation 

Fishbone Analysis / Relationships



Value chain Patterns



Encapsulated Interpretive Model Patterns

Tools help draw out distinctions between context derived insights and those acquired by a holistic Treatise.



The overarching consideration is a function of Unification Criteria.



Properly completed tools enable investigators to effectively establish and empower mode shifting across their domain of discourse.



Internal



Model to Model Patterns



Model to Reality Patterns

ISO 9001 Unification Tool 

Abstraction Inventory 



Various instruments ISO family dependent

Quantification & codification



Model iteration



Model enumeration

Translation Matrices 

2D Articulation Layer (Top most)



Extensive Analytical Layering



Integration of Bayesian Analytics

Self-explanitory. Presenter may want to review the associated web pages and articulate their own perspective holistically.

Mode Shifting Dynamic Context Mode Shifting empowers situational awareness dynamically. Mode shifting enables perspectives available in no other manner. See chart 20 for the decision checkpoint flowchart. Be aware that employed metrics may require mode shifting every bit as much as the constructs and ideas being investigated. 

Because encapsulated interpretive models establish fundamental foundational context relating to reality that context must be mode shifted model to model



The mechanics of mathematics might not change but how all the associated variables and their definitions likely does and they must 100% be so shifted



Status quo thinking can not achieve unification exactly because their foundational context precludes it (e.g. nothing real can transition the spacetime-mass interface absent conversion to energy)



The Elegant Reasonism framework employs standards based tools (e.g. Translation Matrices and ISO 9001 Unification Tool) to enable mode shifting and subsequent analysis



Enabling mode shifting analytics assures the integrity not only of the content of an investigation but the holistic context of developed insights

If we dissect status quo thinking there are two major facets to the shackles ensnaring civilization: Langer Epistemology Errors and a failure to recognize Systems Engineering logical and physical views of the same system. Commission of the former, because of human physiology, tricks people into believing that they are working directly with reality when in fact they are working with abstractions of it. Said another way, they are working with logical representations of reality and that’s where the latter failure comes into play. People get into what’s generally referred to as ‘siloed thinking’. That is thinking vertically and each layer in the vertical stack also commits to Langer Epistemology Errors. Replicate of fading issues obfuscate any ability of status quo thinkers to discern the mechanics of their failures because critical situational awareness thinking employed by Elegant Reasonism is not in play. They have no idea of mechanics behind chart 20. Getting your team to recognize the implications of these two major inhibitors will allow you to fully exploit the power the processes and methods behind Chart 20 bring to the investigator’s tool box. It is the enterprise’s best defense and offense relative to both their current and future intellectual property portfolio. Elegant Reasonism represents a competitive threat to licensing revenue streams for any company whose business plan is so dependent.

Mode Shifting Existing Knowledge Mode shifting what it is we think we know requires intrepidity and honest reflection relative to the goals and objectives of any investigation or endeavor. See chart 20 for the decision checkpoint flowchart. Chart 20 reflects the iterative nature of Elegant Reasonism and incessant application of unification as a philosophical predicate priority consideration. 



Mode Shifting assures context integrity 

Context within the framework is dynamic relative to and respective of encapsulated interpretive models



What is preserved during mode shifting is the thinking behind each model’s instantiation of relative and respective paradigms of interest. A holistic epistemology of the domain of discourse congruent with the unified Universe results

Assures encapsulation integrity 

Paradigm of Interest to Model



Model to Model



Holistically across all analytic layering

Model instantiation of paradigms of interest assurance metrics

When we look at the body of existing knowledge in the holistic context of Elegant Reasonism we can segregate it across the array of encapsulated interpretive models. Ancient constructs, like crystal spheres, would likely fall into an eighth such model which then might be iterated for distinctive constructs. We leave to posterity whether or not to pursue such an endeavor. It might be a useful pearl hunting exercise. Holistically then the body of existing knowledge, both current and historical, may be represented in this way and articulated via the 2D Articulation Layer then subjected to the processes holistically represented by charts 13 through 20. SOLREI INC’s experience is that paradigms of interest tend to be surrounded such that the manifestation within The Emergence Model is illuminated and illustrated to the investigators in an almost self-clarifying manner. When the insights already gained to date are applied, investigators will likely be gobsmacked by what unfolds before them. Our experience was a reaction of “what took humanity so long to recognize this?” The answer to that of course is that LEEs were an inherent temptation built into us from the beginning. Not until we recognized LEEs in the full context of Systems Engineering was this situation to be reconciled resulting in the development of Elegant Reasonism.

The goal and purpose of this exercise is not to flip the individual’s perception but to be able to flip the image at will. Once you are able to flip the image in your mind, then flip it back again. Can you see either image at will? This exercise aides the ability and situational awareness necessary for effective, dynamic, mode shifting.

Most scientists have long recognized abstractions. Few ever anticipated the implications in context of Langer Epistemology Errors.

If the mathematics are identical why is the first not recognized for the second? Saying “the math works” erroneously presumes common context for variable definition across the domain of discourse. When the fundamental foundational context changes, and it is highly systemic, the entire matrix of assumptions must be mode shifted to the new context.

X=yz2 E=mc2

No single discipline of science can accomplish unification. Not mathematics alone. Not astrophysics alone. A holistic approach was required integrating them all and them with philosophy. In hindsight the approach had to be as unified as the investigation’s results. Once that perception and insight was gained, everything fell into place.

Three rows of three equidistant dots. If you are familiar with this puzzle please remain silent and take no action as yet. The lesson learned here may not be what you expect. Raise your hand when you can connect all nine with exactly four straight lines. This includes everyone who knew the anwer before hand. Accomplishing this task is not the point here. The point we wish to discuss is what constrained your recognition of the solution prior to solving the puzzle. Rhetorically what paradigm shifts did you need to affect in your own mind in order to recognize the solution? Barriers to entry mode shifted contexts can have a similar affect on us all as individuals. What we need to be cognizant of are the right set of questions to ask. Which encapsulated interpretive model is driving our perceptions at any given time. Are we thinking holistically in terms consistent with the unified Universe? Status quo thinkers mired in models other than M5 or M6 almost certainly are not. The real work is understanding what happens when we mode shift our various interest areas,those areas most important to us as individuals.

Detail and Clues Matter The glass is obviously and essentially half full. The questions are “of what” and “where are those located”? This glass is in reality inverted and submerged in a clear liquid. The air bubble within it anchors it in place. The image has been rotated 180 degrees to manifest the illusion of a normal water glass. Sometimes what you think you see is not accurate.

Contemplate something that is logically correct but physically different. When we recognize that there may be multiple logically correct interpretations of the same physical system we begin to understand the strategic role Langer Episteology Errors or LEEs have in our understanding of the natural world. This is especially true since human physiology instantly furnishes our brains with abstractions so we can relate to nature.

Persistence & Perseverance

There exist in nature so many clues to unified thinking as to force us to rhetorically ask “what took us so long?” The more we look around us the more clues we see and they have been there all along.

The Epic So What 

Never before in history has humanity been able to wield an epistemology capable of positioning all others relative to the unified Universe. Now it does.



Never before in history have we been able to describe all that is ‘Bang ‘Bang to Bang’ Bang’ and now we have.



Never in history have we had a single cogent paragraph that is scale invariant and applicable to all that is and now we do (e.g. The Emergence Model).



Elegant Reasonism is designed for endurance because it assumes only truth as a function of the unified Universe. It does not assume any given model is “the” answer. It encourages better thinking so long as it is aligned with the unified Universe.



Getting past the cosmology of it all we find that first point more powerful than the second because we find it also unites philosophy and science in common cause.



Elegant Reasonism enables an ability to mode shift what it is we think we already know into the realm of the unified Universe and that powerful capability must be wielded with care and responsibility.



Elegant Reasonism accomplishes ‘unification’, consequently it is a larger tapestry than any single discipline of science. There is no human endeavor involving truth it does not touch or influence either directly or indirectly.

The presenter is encouraged to speak on their personal revelations regarding their insights gained as a function of Elegant Reasonism as presented holistically by this presentation or from presentations from the series “In Unification’s Wake”.

Elegant Reasonism A Brief Introduction & Overview Patent Pending 16405134

This presentation is a complete internal review of the implications of The Elegance of Reason. From this presentation will come the external presentation version. The Elegance of Reason, ISBN 9780977229239. We need to be clear: this presentation was never intended to be about “a book”. It's was intended to be about the concepts developed by that manuscript, and the implications of those concepts relative to the business model of the SolREI Company. Once you've understood the concepts we developed – then you will begin to understand something of our analytic capabilities and general wherewithal. You will too likely know a great deal more than you think you do about a great many other issues. The least of which is starflight. NOTE: The speaker may want to relate the “Columbus' Egg” problem. Depends on the audience and the purpose of the presentation. The point isn't whether or not they see the final answer – it's that we figured it out in the first place and that's the value we bring to the table. We were the ones that figured that out before anyone else did and that's something they need to wrestle with. This isn't a discussion of “command”, it is a discussion of “Knowledge Management” within an engaged “Consulting” arena, to drive objectives of change, to leverage our current situation and circumstances to enable and empower an enduring future through strategic sustainability. The SolREI Company likes impossible challenges. We know that together – we can do this.