Elegant Reasonism In Unification’s Wake, Part 1 Patent Pending 16405134
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any documents, files, or previous e-mail messages attached to it, constitute an electronic communication within the scope of the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 USCA 2510. This communication may contain nonpublic, confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the sole use of the designated recipient(s). The unlawful interception, use or disclosure of such information is strictly prohibited pursuant to 18 USCA 2511 and any applicable laws. If you are not the intended recipient, if you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. Life Space Matters is a registered trademark of SolREI, Inc. H2Orbit is a trademark of SolREI, Inc.
SolREI Publishing West Palm Beach © Copyright SolREI Publishing All Rights Reserved
Notice This presentation is hyperlinked to SolREI, Inc’s primary website. The links herein will resolve only for registered users there. Registration is free. Once users are logged into our website, all hyperlinks in this presentation will resolve to their relative and respective landing pages. All other users will receive a standardized message concerning restricted content and reminding them to register. Simply register and log in to bypass that restriction message.
Visit https://www.solrei.co
Register if you haven’t already
Ask about eligibility for VIP status
Login to the website
Review this presentation and click highlighted links as appropriate
Abstract There are a number of concepts which when mode shifted are either destroyed out right or simply evaporate in the wake of accomplishing unification. A few of those concepts follow and are insights developed by earlier systems reviews mode shifting each relative and respective concept. What follows is predicated on the audience’s exposure to earlier presentations and comprehends their core messages. The reason is simple: many of these examples employ The Emergence Model ONLY because it happens to be the 1st encapsulated model to close to unification as a philosophical predicate priority. The succinct point is a warning to the audience to distinguish requirements of unification from requirements imposed by The Emergence Model, for if another model is ever developed, it will carry with it its own requirements, and they will almost certainly be different.
Mathematics Elegant Reasonism exacerbates the perception that mathematics is complex and hard to comprehend on first blush. In the end it simplifies the processes and leverages capabilities unlike any utility process ever created.
Mathematical domains of discourse are parsed by the relative and respective areas of Translation Matrices that are employed as tools within the Elegant Reasonism framework in support of its epistemology.
Context is established as function of encapsulation associated with both the various interpretive models as well as the analytical layering employed.
Encapsulation constrains model analytics and investigative context
Translation Matrices analytics spans encapsulation and analytic layering
Unification is a philosophical predicate priority consideration in all mathematics
Otherwise normal mathematical rules and laws apply
Holistically all operations conform to Elegant Reasonism rules
Existing Empirical Evidence
Humans do not interact directly with reality. We rather operate with abstractions of reality either directly or indirectly. Believing any given abstraction is actual reality constitutes a Langer Epistemology Error.
Encapsulated Interpretive Models establish fundamental foundational context, and it is that context to which empirical evidence has been tied.
Logically correct experiments, conducted in logically correct manners, immersed in logically correct encapsulated interpretive models will very likely produce logically correct results, AND that has absolutely nothing necessarily to do with the actual reality underpinning those results other than the logical correctness with which they were derived. This does not preclude there being an alternative that is also a simultaneously logically correct model capable of deriving the same results (e.g. mode shifted into the context of that alternative view).
Mode Shifting Existing Knowledge
WARNING: When fundamental foundational context, which is highly systemic, changes driving relationship pattern distinctions within, between and across the various encapsulated interpretive models for any given paradigm of interest one must be situationally aware: Of the implications to: Known knowns, Known Unknowns, and Unknown unknowns Answers to standard what, when, where, why, and how may mode shift between encapsulated interpretive model to model. Be situationally aware of contextual distinctions model to model Expect the unexpected…. … Across all domains of discourse
Mode Shifting Entanglement Q: What do rainbows, (aircraft) glory*, two-slit experiments, and waveparticle duality all have in common? A: Entanglement of architectural mass and limited by Severance
The architectures of mass are complex, composite, and dynamic
They are not necessarily isotropic (e.g. think dandelion)
Architectures can be kinetic and/or have kinetic constituents
Constituents can dampen to constrain otherwise dynamic constructs (e.g. think quarks within protons and neutrons)
Structures can change Severance values as the architecture absorbs or transmits internal force and stress This is why formal studies and systems reviews are vital going forward * See SolREI Studios video on aircraft glory
Multiverse The multiverse is the concept that there are an infinite multitude of spacetime bubbles each of which is a Universe unto itself.
This concept requires M1, M2, or M3 to be real descriptions rather than the logical constructs they are. (e.g. requires commission of Langer Epistemology Errors).
M5 defines space as dimensionless, and the multiverse requires a core construct to be dimensionally defined.
Nothing real can transit the spacetime-mass interface
M5 establishes any MBP, or set of them, as the geometric basis point in any given Event Frame.
M5 develops the concept that dimensions are a function of the intrinsic nature of MBPs not space.
Parallel Universes Parallel Universes are the concept that there are an infinite number of Universes parallel to the current time-line. (e.g. infinite time-lines)
This concept requires M1, M2, or M3 to be real descriptions rather than the logical constructs they are. (e.g. requires commission of Langer Epistemology Errors).
M5 defines space as dimensionless and dimensions as a function of MBPs not space.
Nothing real can transit the spacetime-mass interface
M5 establishes any MBP, or set of them, as the geometric basis point in any given Event Frame. M5 develops the concept that dimensions are a function of the intrinsic nature of MBPs not space.
Experimental energy empowers the Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance to configure MBPs into recognized constructs. Such detected constructs would be misconstrued as having come from parallel Universes.
Time Travel Time travel is the novel concept that one can travel into the past or the distant future. This thought experiment is standard fare in science fiction literature and produces many paradoxes.
M5 defines time as an action displacement index. Action is always positive. Consequently the “arrow of time” is always forward (e.g. positive).
M5 eliminates the dimensional nature of time as envisioned by M1, M2, or M3
Resulting indexing of relative the relevant action creates the illusion of time
M5 establishes that the intrinsic nature of MBPs derives two processes: a build process called The Fundamental Entanglement Function is limited by the other, a failure process, called Severance.
Severance is responsible for the constancy associated with the concept of time
Severance is responsible for Lorentz Factor measurement changes
Nothing Can Exceed Lightspeed Every experiment has measured the speed of light to be so constant that it has its own variable ‘c’ denoting it.
M5 establishes that photons are emitted from electrons due to centripetal force.
M5 establishes that the intrinsic nature of MBPs derives two processes: a build process called The Fundamental Entanglement Function is limited by the other, a failure process, called Severance. The variable ‘c’ is mode shifted in M5 and assigned to the limiting process of Severance, which is why photons are always emitted at that velocity.
Interferometers measure local Event Frames. Cosmological frames and spectral analysis support vindication of Edwin Hubble’s body of work as super luminal.
Causality is a function of action not dimension
Big Bang The Big Bang is stereo-typically characterized as the initial Event resulting in everything we perceive as “the Universe”.
First M5 redefines space as dimensionless nothing which then requires all attention to be mode shifted to the architectures of mass which are derivatives of the intrinsic nature of its Most Basic Particles or MBPs whose configurations produce all real objects.
Severance results in the frangibility of such defined mass in Event Frames whose values exceed those limits (including black holes).
M5 envisions an Event Frame of colliding black holes whose mass is equivalent to the measured mass and characterized by energies exceeding Severance for all objects in that frame. Statistical circles in the WMAP data suggest more than two objects were in that frame. This same data suggests real objects exist beyond our Particle Horizon.
“Our” Universe resulted from ‘this’ Event. The implications are that the real Universe is comprised of an infinite number of such frames and is unfathomably huge.
Our Big Bang was ‘the’ Big Bang The Big Bang is stereo-typically characterized as the initial Event resulting in everything we perceive as “the Universe” AND that ‘that’ is all there is...
“Our” Universe resulted from ‘this’ Event. The implications are that the real Universe is comprised of an infinite number of such frames and is unfathomably huge.
Beyond our Particle Horizon undoubtedly lay countless other such Events resulting in countless other Event Frames (e.g. Universes). “The” Universe is actually the sum of all of such Events and everything else which may also exist. Theoretically that would include the processes that were the genesis of MBPs in M5 (or any other model complying with the realm of c’s).
Backed up by galactic acceleration objects isotropic in the astronomical data
Z-factors are mode shifted
WMAP data needs to be (more thoroughly) mode shifted
Graviton architecture needs exploration and systems review
Black Holes are [in M5] essentially ‘graviton stars’
Inflationary Theory The Inflationary Theory was developed because galactic acceleration was determined to be superluminal and a rational explanation was then needed to explain the phenomena.
M5 defines space as dimensionless nothing, therefore, it is not created by the Big Bang
M5 holds the Big Bang a function of an Event Frame of supermassive black holes whose vectors intersect and whose energies exceeded all Severance values for the frame. The statistical circles in the WMAP data suggest more than two objects in that frame. Severance results in the frangibility of all mass under conditions exceeding those values in such Event Frames. Such supermassive objects dismantle into the mirth which instantly begins reassembling consistent with the M5 cogent description.
Inflationary theory requires a concept called rapid expansion to explain certain elements of the first three minutes. Rapid Expansion as a concept has a corollary called infinite compression which can not be reconciled against Black Hole Growth. Kill the corollary and you kill the other side of that same proverbial coin.
Spacetime is real The notion of spacetime being real is a Langer Epistemology Error.
Spacetime is a logically correct construct in the context established by M1, M2, and M3.
Mathematics depicting correct resolutions regarding spacetime are in fact justifications for the logical correctness of context established by the encapsulated interpretive models employing this construct.
Logically correct experiments, conducted in a logically correct manner, immersed in a logically correct encapsulated interpretive model establishing a logically correct context will most likely produce logically correct results, AND that has nothing necessarily to do with reality other than to illustrate that it is capable of supporting that logical view. It does NOT eliminate any other encapsulated interpretive model’s context from also being logically correct.
Lorentz Factors The Lorentz equations have long historical affinity for and with relativity. Most of the work to date in the various areas are firmly entrenched in M1 or M2 thinking. Both of those models are logical in nature, and therefore most of that work now needs mode shifting into alignment with the unified Universe.
Mathematics depicting correct resolutions regarding spacetime are in fact justifications for the logical correctness of context established by the encapsulated interpretive models employing this construct.
M5 establishes that the intrinsic nature of MBPs derives two processes: a build process called The Fundamental Entanglement Function is limited by the other, a failure process, called Severance. The variable ‘c’ is mode shifted in M5 and assigned to the limiting process of Severance which is why photons are always emitted at that velocity. The other aspect of Severance is its limiting factor on configurations of MBPs. Mode shifting the reasons nothing seems to exceed c is that it results in the configurations of MBPs perceived as mass to fail or dismantle into their constituent MBPs or configurations of them. Remember in M5 mass is a complex composite architecture whose constituents are configurations of MBPs.
Microscopic Black Holes Microscopic black holes were postulated as a function of LHC experiments at CERN. They are a logic artifact of M1, M2, and M3 thinking, usually resulting from Langer Epistemology Errors.
Stephen Hawking and Jacob Bekenstein established Black Hole entropy noting the Boltzman Constant and the area of the Event Horizon by calculations of the Planck Length.
Hawking/Bekenstein’s work allowed us to mode shift “Action per Unit Area” minimums relative to Schwarzchild Radius suggesting a minimum radius for Black Holes well above microscopic levels. The smallest on record at the time of this writing was about 10 solar masses yielding a radius about 30 km.
Consequently microscopic black holes are treated as logical constructs of the models employing the spacetime constructs. They are not considered real by M5.
Age of the Universe Predominant thinking holds the Universe’s age to about 13.8 billion years, and that’s a problem in many regards.
M5 dismantles limits on the speed of light and vindicates Edwin Hubble’s original body of work and data. This essentially blows up Inflationary Theory and its use of z-factors for expansion of spacetime.
M5 pushes the scale of the Universe considerably, and its associated age becomes immensely ancient as a result.
How ancient is work still needing to be done as a function of mode shifting z-factors to M5 as part of a comprehensive systems review of the WMAP data? We estimated something probably greater than 70 billion years.
Teleportation Teleportation is a concept in M1 or M2 thinking resulting in a conversion of a real object to energy in one place to a reconstitution of that same real object in a different location.
The Emergence Model recognizes that information is a function of complex composite architectures of mass. Destroy the architecture and you lose the information it contained. Teleportation is therefore not considered viable by M5.
This same insight also eliminates the possibility of a holographic Universe
Noting that real objects are eviscerated at the Event Horizon of a Black Hole also implies a loss of information which are derivatives of higher ordered configurations
FTL Travel Faster Than Lightspeed (FTL) travel is prohibited under M1, M2, and M3 but mode shifting into M5 opens potentials not otherwise available. M5 dismantling previous limitations imposed by those other models does not necessarily support FTL travel.
Warp Drive, Alcubierry Drives and similar constructs all are rendered moot by M5 because of how space is defined there. One can not warp nothing. Because M5 defines space as dimensionless, it also renders concepts like Hyperspace moot as well.
New concepts like ‘Managed Severance Drives’ emerge and while they may hold promise are exceedingly problematic.
Supernovas eject massive objects into interstellar space. Even a small object becomes problematic. The chances for deflector technology do not seem viable. This means generational transport would likely be preferred. Everything in space is moving. If you miss your target destination, you may be traveling along that vector a very very long time...
Ironically, Kepler data implying the existence of Dyson Spheres lends credence to this insight. This insight reconciles the Drake Equation with the Fermi Paradox
M5/M6 Answer Everything Holistically The Emergence Model is comprised of both M5 and M6. It is The Emergence Model required by Elegant Reasonism and not just M5. There remains a great deal of work yet to do, and while that is true, there is much they have to teach us even in their nascent state today.
Almost nothing is known about the complex composite architectures of mass in the context of Knot Theory
Almost nothing is known to specificity about how architectures of mass manifest physical properties despite clear affinity to Euler’s Beta and Gamma functions often related to in String Theory
Genesis of the Most Basic Particle (MBP) seems relegated to the realm of philosophy
Inevitably we come to the argument of ‘something vs nothing’ and where the something that is came from. This was the origins of the MBP employed by M5.
While we can postulate extrapolations of The Standard Model of Particle Physics and mode shift those extrapolations, because we know so little about the architectures involved, there remains much to learn and know.
There seems to be clear avenues of R&D existing technology may offer. Antenna R&D may yield insights into the architecture of photons and electrons, for example.
Elegant Reasonism Certainty Elegant Reasonism as a framework supporting an epistemology, which together produced The Emergence Model, seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe. This view and description is enduring. Enduring not just in insights but in value and objective. There can be no higher affinity in science.
Elegant Reasonism as a framework employs industry leading quality management systems standards and metrics
Elegant Reasonism seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe. Truths meeting these requirements are universal in nature to the extent that models employed meet those same requirements
Elegant Reasonism is a super-set epistemology in the sense that others may be employed within it but are required to be subjected to quantitative/statistical weighting as a function of affinity for the unified Universe (realm of c’s metric analysis)
Certainty within Elegant Reasonism is in the end a story told holistically employed Six Sigma metrics across its total domain of discourse and presuming that it never crosses the line into commission of Langer Epistemology Errors
Always ask: Does my thinking conform to the realm of c’s?
In particular: Does it close to unification as a philosophical predicate priority?
Elegant Reasonism In Unification’s Wake, Part 1 Patent Pending 16405134
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any documents, files, or previous e-mail messages attached to it, constitute an electronic communication within the scope of the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 USCA 2510. This communication may contain nonpublic, confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the sole use of the designated recipient(s). The unlawful interception, use or disclosure of such information is strictly prohibited pursuant to 18 USCA 2511 and any applicable laws. If you are not the intended recipient, if you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. Life Space Matters is a registered trademark of SolREI, Inc. H2Orbit is a trademark of SolREI, Inc.
SolREI Publishing West Palm Beach © Copyright SolREI Publishing All Rights Reserved