Undergraduate Landscape Architecture Portfolio Evan Girdhar Oscar Barrow
ended:
State University (Fall 2020 - Fall 2024) ch. Student)
ior High School (Fall 2016 - Spring 2020)
emic Commitments:
Education Background State College, PA
Schools Attended: Education Background Education Background Pennsylvania University (Fall 2020 - Fall 2024) Education Background Lititz, PA State (3rd-Year LArch. Student)
State College, PA
Schools Schools Attended: Attended:
Pennsylvania State University (Fall(Fall 20202016 2024) State College, PA Schools Attended: Warwick Senior High School - Spring 2020) Lititz, Pennsylvania State University (Fall- Summer 2020 - Fall 2024) StatePA College, PA andscape Architecture Student Society (LASS) (Fall(4th-Year 2020 Present) LArch. Student) Pennsylvania State University (Fall 2020 Fall 2024) State College, PA (3rd-Year LArch. Student) (3rd-Year LArch. Student) Other Academic Commitments: Warwick Senior High School (Fall 2016 - Spring 2020) Lititz, PA Member of Landscape Architecture Student Society (LASS) (Fall 2020 - Present) Warwick Senior High School (Fall 2016 - Spring 2020) Lititz, PA Warwick Senior High School (Fall 2016 - Spring 2020) Lititz, PA
olunteer Experience
Contact Information: Other Academic Commitments: Other Commitments: Member ofAcademic Landscape Architecture Student Society (LASS) (Fall 2020 - Present) and Lube (Summer 2022) Skills: Adapting to Client Needs Name: Evan G. Barrow Work & Volunteer Experience Other Academic Commitments: Arts Ambassador for the College of Arts and Architecture Member of Landscape Architecture Student Society (LASS) (Fall 2020 - Present) Phone: +1 (717) 847-7850 Member of Landscape Architecture Student Society (LASS) (Fall 2020 - Present) s (Fall 2019 - SpringInformation: 2020) Skills: Collaboration, Speaking with Clients Contact Landis Wash and Lube (Summer 2022) Skills: Adapting to Client Needs E-mail: eqb5431@psu.edu Contact Information: Contact Information: Work&and Volunteering Name: Evan G. Barrow Work Volunteer Experience Socials: @ev.barrow onservation Abroad Trip (Summer 2018) Skills: Planting, Community Interfacing Name: Evan G.G. Barrow Name: Evan Barrow Work & (Fall Volunteer Experience Landis Homes 2019 Spring 2020) Skills: Collaboration, Speaking with Clients Phone: +1 (717) 847-7850 at Derck and Edson LLC. (Summer 2023) Lititz, PA Phone: +1+1 (717) 847-7850 Phone: (717) 847-7850 Intern Landis Wash and Lube (Summer 2022) Skills: Adapting to Client Needs E-mail: eqb5431@psu.edu Landis Wash and Lube (Summer 2022) Skills: Adapting to ClientInterfacing Needs Costa Wash Rica and Conservation Abroad Trip (Summer 2018) Skills: Planting, Community E-mail: eqb5431@psu.edu E-mail: eqb5431@psu.edu Landis Lube (Summer 2022) Lititz, PA Socials: @ev.barrow Landis Homes (Fall 2019 - Spring 2020) Skills: Collaboration, Speaking with Clients Socials: @ev.barrow
cies
Gaming
LandisLandis HomesHomes (Fall 2019 - Spring 2020) (Fall 2019 - Spring 2020)
Lititz, PA
Skills: Collaboration, Speaking with Clients
ReadingInterests Skating Costa Rica Conservation Abroad Trip (Summer 2018) Costa Rica Conservation Abroad Trip (Summer 2018)
Costa Rica Conservation Abroad Trip (Summer 2018)
Drawing Gaming Interests Interests and Skills Interests Drawing Drawing
Gaming Gaming
Skills: Planting, Community Interfacing Skills: Planting, Community Interfacing
Reading
Skating
Reading Reading
Skating Skating
Proficiencies Hand Drafting: Microsoft 365: AutoCAD:
Hand Drafting:
Sketchup: VR Softwares: Lumion: AutoCAD: AutoCAD: Adobe CC: Lumion: Lumion:
Microsoft 365: Hand Drafting: Hand Drafting: VR Softwares: Microsoft 365: Microsoft 365:
Adobe CC: Adobe CC:
VR Softwares: VR Softwares:
Proficiencies Proficiencies
Table of Contents Design Projects:
Germany: Three Concepts Avian Haven Park
11
Sidney Freidman Park Redesign
2 65 66 67 68 DI
8 8
71 TC 71.32 BC 70.82
TC 71.59 BC 71.09
3
%L
1.5
%
4
%
70
%
BR 69.14
70.67
70 TR/BS 69.40
g ndin
71.13
La % 1.5
%
6.2
%
8.3
71.03
70.57 TC 71.02 BC 70.52
71
72.80
%
LP 71.20 71.90
73.40
FFE
0
73.4
5
73.40
TFFE 73.40 BFFE 64.40
69 68 67
69
73.40
TFFE 73.40 BFFE 64.40
64.40 64.40
Project Title
68
72.90
TFFE 73.40 BFFE 64.40
71 70
70
TFFE 73.40 BFFE 64.40
73.40
71.90
71.90
Landscape Grading Project
70.90
71.80 0
72.9
TS 72.80
%
3.3
7.5
TR 73.40
64.90
TR/BS 69.40 7 Risers @6" 8 Treads @18"
72.90
%
%
HPS 68.50
72.90
72 1.5
69
BR 68.97
FFE
71.15
TR 73.40
72.40 72.40
DI
TC 69.14 BC 68.64
TC 68.88 BC 68.38 DI
73
2.40 .40
TC 69.02 TC 69.07 BC 68.52 BC 68.57 TC 68.82 BC 68.32
7.9
%
69
71
LP 71.08
1.5
68 68
TC 70.06 BC 69.56
TC 71.56 BC 71.06 TC 71.29 BC 70.79
%
71.35
3.4
71.01
72
72.40
0
TC 70.37 BC 69.87TC 70.31 BC 69.81
TC 71.56 BC 71.06 TC 71.63 BC 71.13
0.5
71.23
%
%
ing
0.5
7.3
2 2
71.32
and
TC 71.02 BC 70.52
HPS 71.90 TC 71.63 BC 71.13 TC 72.15 BC 71.65
TC 71.83 BC 71.33
71.20
4.4
TC 70.10 BC 69.60 71
TC 69.26 BC 68.76
TC 68.82 BC 68.32 TC 69.14 BC 68.64 TC 69.02 TC 69.07 BC 68.52 BC 68.57
X MA % 6.1
1.00
TC 68.87 BC 68.37DI TC 69.79 BC 69.29
TC 71.29 BC 70.79
TC 72.15 BC 71.65
Center Stage Courtyard
69
Technical Projects:
TC 71.79 BC 71.29 TC 71.83 BC 71.33
TC 71.79 71.59 BC 71.29 71.09
90
Class Code 102 File Name 102_Project2_Final Date 12/4/22
??.??
67 66
LPS 64.44
65
64.40
Designed Meadow, Pollinator Exercise 2 Garden andProject Tree Terrace Project Scale
66 65
64.90
Grading Project 2 Final
64.40
64
*Most Projects Not to Scale Unless Scale Bar is Shown
1" = 40'-0" Sheet Number #1
Top: 2 Bott nd Year om:1 S st Ye ketch o f ar S ketc Brookly h of n Stein Naval La man Park ndscape (Lan ( cast Brooklyn er, P , NY A) )
Germany: Three Concepts This was the thrid out of four projects we did while abroad in Germany. We were tasked with choosing a site from around Bonn, Germany and redesigning the site with three concepts in mind. My chosen site, Stiftsplatz, is a half park, half parking lot serving the surrounding shops, eateries. and institutions. I used lenses of recreation, heat, and stormwater to cater the site to different uses and needs. Across my designs I emphasized vertical design, implementing hills, raised bridged, and depressions. This culminated in varied levels of play, efficient stormwater mitigation, and effective heat use and reduction.
Perspectives (below and same order as plans on right): Here is shown a clear view of the relationships in height between bridge walkers, hill vistors, and pumptrack users. The use of topography creates a truly multimodal experience. Section of Dryness/Heat Concept (on right): The section cuts through the design’s center, showcasing the bed of flat rocks and the splashpad that surrounds it. Water keeps the area cool, and black rocks warm pedestrians up.
Stormwater Plan: The ‘Storm Skater’ design uses three hills, a pumptrack, and a raised pavillion over a large stormwater basin to manage stormwater in a way that is interactive for pedestrians.
Heat/Dryness Plan: The ‘Rock Rest’ design takes the most simplistic approach, bringing meadow grass, trees, and more native plants to cool down the site. Rocks for sunbathing act as the centerpiece.
Recreation Plan: The ‘Urban Climb’ plan adds hills and large trees to the site, equipped with raised bridges for unique play opportunities. Paths cut across the site to maintain pedestrian routes.
Center Stage Courtyard This site is on my college campus in State College, PA. It is nestled adjacent to the Palmer Museum of Art and Visual Arts Building, and the design prompt urged us to create a space which would reflect the happenings within the two buildings. In response, I crafted a very open space with light tree cover, allowing easy pedestrian access to the buildings and a large space for public congregations with the addition of a stage.
Concept Diagramming: Multiple iterations of the site were diagrammed in order to find effectively accomodate for pedestrian traffic.
Final Plan View: I used circular geometry to create a welcoming space despite the intimidating brick architecture surrounding the site. Areas were designed to allow seating outside an indoor cafe and spaces to display the arts through theater and sculpture.
PHOTOS OF PHYSICAL MODEL AND MAYBE SECTIONS
Physical Model: This model was constructed to better visualize the site through foam, cotton, cardboard, and soil.
Revit / Unity Engine Model: This was made as the final project of my VR course in order to take the visualization of the site a step further to the point where I could virtually walk through my design.
Sidney Freidman Park This project was located at a local State College park and required us to look into the demographics of the community and various existing site conditions for the first time in our education. I focused on prioritizing pedestrian through-routes and youth engagement. The challenge of this site was the steep topography present at the site and how we would react in order to create accessible paths and programmed areas.
5 Minute Walk & Pedestrian User Analysis Sidney Friedman Park State College, PA
Evan Barrow - LArch 116 - March 2021
Section Cuts (Not to Scale): The first section cuts through the center of the park, vertically, showing the path widths in relation to the vegetation and topography. The second section also highlights the topography, showing how the terraced seating area overlooks the playground near the park’s entrance.
Accessibility A This site analy surrounding c use and popu This was done audience for m
Graphic Key:
Children/Teens/Students Mixed Age Groups Adult/Seniors Residential Commercial/Public Industrial/Gov. Education Recreation Walking Distance Limit *City Blocks are highlighted according to the majority land use. Symbols indicate the block’s user group’s estimated age range.
Analysis: ysis examined the city sectors for land ulation demographics. e to understand the my site.
Final Hand-Drafted/Photoshop Plan (Not to Scale): This plan was one of my first in PSU’s program. I handdrafted the plan with pencil and used photoshop to place the handdrawn trees repeatedly. I kept the site mostly flat at the programmed spaces using the little knowledge of grading practices I had. I focused on pedestrians routes and making space for nearby youth and families.
File N 102_P Date 12/4/2
Landscape Grading Projects This project was located at a local State College park and required us to look into the demographics of the community and various existing site conditions for the first time in our education. I focused on prioritizing pedestrian through-routes and youth engagement. The challenge of this site was the steep topography present at the site and how we would react in order to create accessible paths and programmed areas.
65 66 67
LINEWORK LEGEND
68 DI
69
BC 68.90
TC 69.92 BC 69.42
TC 69.93 BC 69.43
69 TC 68.87 BC 68.37DI
TC 70.40 BC 69.90
TC 70.58 BC 70.08 DI
TC 70.68 BC 70.18
TC 69.55 BC 69.05
6%
71.7
71.73
3
72.40
LPS 62.65
71.35
71.03
70.57 TC 71.02 BC 70.52
71
72.80 %
72.4
0
LP 71.20 71.90
TFFE 72.40 BFFE 63.40
73.40
FFE
0
73.4
70 69
73.40
72.90
73.40
Proje
68
TFFE 73.40 BFFE 64.40 TFFE 73.40 BFFE 64.40
TFFE 73.40 BFFE 64.40
70
TFFE 72.40 BFFE 63.40
71.90
67 66
LPS 64.44
65
64.40
73.40
71.90 71
62.73
70.90
71.80 0
72.9
TS 72.80
72.90
TR 73.40 TR 73.40
72.40 72.40
HPS 68.50
TR/BS 69.40 7 Risers @6" 8 Treads @18"
72.90
72 1.5
69
BR 68.97
FFE
71.15
LP 71.08
%
72.40
62.70 63.40
% g 6.2 din Lan % % 8.3 1.5
73
72.40 72.40 FFE
70.67
70 TR/BS 69.40
71.13
1.5
72
BR 69.14
%
62.73
TFFE 71.73 BFFE 62.73
71.23
TC 68.88 BC 68.38 DI
71.01
72
DI
TC 69.14 BC 68.64
%
63
71.23 71.90
64
and ing 1.5 %
70
%
71
7.5
TFFE 71.73 BFFE 62.73
71.32
%L
%
TC 69.02 TC 69.07 BC 68.52 BC 68.57 TC 68.82 BC 68.32
7.9
66
71.73
4.4 7.3
TC 71.32 BC 70.82
%
FFE
67
65
70.90
71
69
TC 71.56 BC 71.06 TC 71.29 BC 70.79
%
68
71.73
HPS 71.90 TC 71.63 BC 71.13 TC 72.15 BC 71.65
3.3
71.73
71.20
%
70.73
4.0
69
71.00
TC 71.83 BC 71.33
TC 72.15 BC 71.65
3.4
TC 71.56 BC 71.06 TC 71.63 BC 71.13
68 68
TC 70.06 BC 69.56
X MA % 6.1
TC 71.79 TC 71.59 BC 71.29 BC 71.09
HPS 70.90
TC 70.37 BC 69.87TC 70.31 BC 69.81
TC 71.29 BC 70.79
TC 71.79 BC 71.29 TC 71.83 BC 71.33
71
70
TC 71.02 BC 70.52
TC 71.59 BC 71.09
2.0
TC 69.28 BC 68.78 DI
71
TC 71.32 BC 70.82
TC 70.86 TC 70.85BC 70.36 BC 70.35
70
TC 69.56 BC 69.06
TC 70.10 BC 69.60
71
TC 69.26 BC 68.76
TC 68.82 BC 68.32 TC 69.14 BC 68.64 TC 69.02 TC 69.07 BC 68.52 BC 68.57
TC 69.79 BC 69.29
%
TC 68.75 BC 68.25 TC 69.40
2.1 %
TC 68.07 BC 67.57
69
70
0.5
68
1.81 %
TC 69.66 BC 69.16 DI
TC 69.40 BC 68.90
2.1 %
TC 68.07 BC 67.57
0.5
Centerline Maj. Prop. Con. Min. Prop. Con. Maj. Ex. Con. Min. Ex. Con. Curb Inner Face Curb Outer Face Annotations Building Building Hatch Walkway/Porch Retaining Wall Site Vegetation Property Line Parking Spots
69
TC 68.75 BC 68.25
TFFE 73.40 BFFE 64.40
69 68
64.40 64.40
??.??
67 66
63.40
64.90
65
64.90
64.40
64
1"=40' 20
0
40
80
Grading Final Project: This project tasked students with grading a parking lot and directing stormwater around a group of townhomes.
Gradi Final
Exerc Proje Scale 1" = 4 Shee #1
102_Final Stormwater Date Final 04/23/2023 Exercise FinalCenterline Maj. Prop. Con. Scale Min. Prop. Con. Maj. Ex. Con. Min. Ex. Con. 1" = Pavement/Walls 30'-0" Annotations Parking Spots Sheet Number Building Hatch #1 Building Site Vegetation LINEWORK LEGEND
1103
1104 1105
1106
HP 1106.50
HP 1106.50
05 11
1108
%
03
11
04 1105
04
11
TC 1104.40 BC 1103.90
LP 1102.50
LP 1102.50 RDI 1103.20
HP 1104.50
LP 1102.50
1104 HP 1104.50
HP 1104.50
1103
1104 1104 HP 1104.50
LP 1102.50
HP 1104.50 03 11
HP 1104.50
1095.06
BR 1101.48 TR 1101.38
AX
RDI 1104.5
25
TW 1097.50 BW 1095.50
%
TW 1097.25 BW 1095.25 1095.23 1095.15 1095.13
7.8%
TW 1097.25 BW 1095.25 BR 1095.23
1111
7%
5.
BR 1099.03
1099.00
TR 1098.99
5.9%
TR 1098.83 5.4%
TR 1096.94 BR 1097.20 1097.01
BR 1097.20
1096.98
2
1
1096
1097
1098
9 10 9
1100
110
11
8%
5.
TR 1096.88
03
1104
1098.92
1105
1096
1099
1098 1097
1102
1101
04
05
11
HP 1105.50
M
BR 1101.48 TR 1101.38
HP 1105.50
25%
HP 1105.50 LP 1103.33
TW 1106.15 BW 1104.15
1095.15 BR 1095.15
1108
1100
11
04 HP 1104.50 HP 1104.50
11
HP 1104.50
BR 1099.03
1107
LP 1103.33
HP 1105.50
1095.33
TW 1106.15 BW 1104.15
8.0%
LP 1102.50 1103
HP 1104.50 TR 1103.76 TR 1103.84
RDI 1103.25
CC 1103.57 TC 1104.16 BC 1103.66
04
TC 1104.78 BC 1104.28
HPS 1103.50
1106
HP 1105.50
1095.04
LP 1103.33
HP 1105.50
11
CC 1104.41
1104 HP 1104.50
1110
1103
1104
2.5
%
1095.33
1095.50
HP 1104.50
1109
9 110
%
%
1095.50
11
05
12
1
1104.16
RDI 1103.20
13
RDI 1104.5
%
11
11 11
HP 1105.50
2.0
04
HP 1105.50 LP 1104.01 LP 1103.50 05 HP 1105.50 11 05 HP 1105.50 11
2.0
1104.01
4 10
TC 1105.19 BC 1104.69
25%
TR 1104.45 1104.50
2.5
TC 1106.01 BC 1105.51 LP 1105.01 CC 1105.25 6 HP 1106.50 110 HP 1106.50 06 05 11 RDI 1104.75 11
HP 1105.50 LP 1103.33 1105.51
1104.34
BR 1104.08
11 0
M
%
AX
2
TW 1097.25 BW 1095.25 TW 1097.25 BW 1095.25
1095.05
1104.64 LP 1103.01 04 11
1104.54
8.3%
TC 1105.31 BC 1104.81
TC 1105.67 BC 1105.17
HP 1106.50
%
%
1105.28
RDI 1104.38
TR 1104.82
BR 1104.41
TC 1105.51 BC 1105.01 TC 1105.50 BC 1105.00
RDI 1105.75 HP 1106.50 LP 1105.01
0 5.
2.5
1106.00
11
5.0
2.5 %
1104.63 1104.95
1104.49
7.6%
parking lot meeting ADA requirements and using bus and car drop-offs. Grading was a special challenge with the hills that the site sits on and around. A rear, lower patio is included too.
TC 1105.85 BC 1105.35
% 25
Exercise Final Scale 1" = 30'-0" Sheet Number Stormwater Final Project: For our Stormwater class, we were assigned to design a #1
06
CC 1106.27
X2
BS 1095.90
1095.50
%
Stormwater Final
11 TC 1106.42 BC 1105.92 TC 1106.44 TC 1106.40 BC 1105.94 BC 1105.90
%
HP 1107.50 1107
05
11
%
HP 1107.50
07
MA
BS 1100.00 TS 1099.90
1105.71
05
11 LP 1106.01 1107
TW 1107.67 BW 1105.67
19 Risers @6" 17 Treads @12"
2.5
3.0 %
LP 1106.01 HP 1107.50
TW 1107.49 BW 1105.49 TS 1105.50 1105.50
TR 1104.96
1105.68
TC 1106.59 BC 1106.09
TC 1106.95 BC 1106.45
1104.95
HPS 1105.00
TC 1105.56 BC 1105.06
2.5
HPS 1108.70
RDI 1106.95
07
BR 1104.42 1104.49
05
11
TC 1105.72 BC 1105.22
TC 1106.00 BC 1105.50
HP 1107.50
HP 1107.50
CC 1107.46
8 110
06
TR 1104.67
%
2.5
TC 1107.32 BC 1106.82
TC 1105.86 TC 1105.86BC 1105.36 TC 1105.80 BC 1105.36 BC 1105.30 TC 1106.14 1105.83 BC 1105.64
11
1104.68
1104.51
12
TC 1105.73 BC 1105.23
11
LP 1105.10
11
LP 1107.01
1108 HP 1108.50 1108.50
06
11
HP 1104.50 03 11 04 11 HP 1104.50 HP 1104.50
1104.01
TC 1105.81 BC 1105.31
06
%
HP
11
HP 1104.50
TC 1105.17 BR 1104.03 BC 1104.67
TC 1106.26 BC 1105.76 1106.24 1106.19 1106.13 TC 1106.11 BC 1105.61
HP 1107.50
06
TC 1107.98 BC 1107.48
08
RDI 1107.85 LP 1107.01 HP 1108.50
TC 1108.15 BC 1107.65
%
CC 1108.35
06 11 07 11 107 1 HP 1107.50
TC 1106.79 BC 1106.29
TC 1105.78 BC 1105.28
11
2.5
2.5
TC 1109.14 BC 1108.64
Project Title
HP 1107.50
HP 1107.50
25%
RDI 1106.75
TC 1107.68 BC 1107.18
CC 1106.72
LP 1105.10
RDI 1106.22
%
CC 1107.26 TC 1108.12 BC 1107.62
11
HP 1107.50 LP 1105.10
2.5
LP 1105.10
9
2.5 %
%
%
HP 1107.50
HP 1107.50
HP 1107.50
0 11
07
TC 1107.73 BC 1107.23
08
11
HP 1107.50
LP 1102.50
TC 1105.21 BC 1104.71 TC 1105.11 BC 1104.61
TC 1105.32 BC 1104.82
2.5
2.5
09
11
RDI 1104.00
1104.74
1104
LP 1106.10
HP 1108.50
TC 1109.77 BC 1109.27
%
2.5
TC 1108.19 BC 1107.69 TC 1108.11 HP 1108.50 BC 1107.61 TC 1108.02 HP 1108.50 BC 1107.52 08
CC 1107.86
HP 1108.50
LP 1102.50 HP 1104.50
TC 1104.78 BC 1104.28 TC 1104.74 BC 1104.24
2.5 %
TC 1108.45 BC 1107.95
HP 1108.50
07
11
DI 1104.47
TC 1104.75 BC 1104.25
2.5 %
11 LP 1106.10
03 11 HP 1104.50
LP 1102.50
CC 1108.03
RDI 1107.25
11
TC 1104.50 BC 1104.00 DI 1104.00
TC 1107.75 BC 1107.25
BC 1107.92
TC 1108.66 BC 1108.16
HP 1104.50
04
08
TC 1108.79 BC 1108.29
25%
LP 1102.55
11
TC 1108.69 BC 1108.19
HP 1104.50
HP 1104.50
CC 1104.10
TC 1108.47 BC 1107.67
1109
CC 1104.64
TC 1107.63 BC 1107.13
TC 1108.26 BC 1107.76 TC 1108.32 TC 1108.42 BC 1107.82
TC 1109.08 BC 1108.58
HP 1104.50
11
11
05
TC 1107.70 BC 1107.20
25
09
11
HP 1105.50
HP 1105.50 LP 1103.34
TC 1107.63 BC 1107.13 TC 1109.30 BC 1108.80
HP 1105.50
LP 1103.34
TC 1109.78 BC 1105.28
2.5 %
TC 1108.20 BC 1107.70
11
CC 1105.78
%
1108
HP 1106.50
LP 1104.34
LP 1105.10 TC 1107.36 RDI 1106.58 BC 1106.86 TC 1107.42 BC 1106.92 CC 1107.08 TC 1107.52 BC 1107.02
TC 1108.11 BC 1107.61
TC 1108.72 BC 1108.22
LP 1104.34
25
2.5 %
TC 1109.82 BC 1109.32
5
HP 1106.50 110
TC 1107.24 BC 1106.74
1106 LP 1105.10
HP 1107.50
TC 1108.90 TC 1108.71 BC 1108.40 BC 1108.21
HP 1107.50
04
HP 1107.50
TC 1109.09 BC 1108.59 TC 1109.54 BC 1109.04
NORTH
1107 1107
06
HP 1107.50
08
11 06
09
%
11
HP 1106.50
25
1107 11
11
25.0 %
25.0 %
Work Boundary Site Boundary Roads
HP 1105.50
Planting Methods Coursework This coursework covers what I learned on planting schedules, planting plans, and construction documents for planting plans. Extensive research was done into plant ecology to determine appropriate species for our semester’s site: the Milennium Science Center on Penn State University’s main campus. The objective of the coursework was designing a diverse meadow, two tree plazas, and two pollinator gardens. (PM)
(PM) (PM)
(MM)
(MM)
(MM)
(URM)
(MM)
(MM)
(PM) (LRM)
(URM)
(PM)
(MM) UNDERGROUND STORM WATER RETENTION
(URM)
UNDERG WATER
(PM)
(PM)
(PM) (PM)
(NMEL)
(PM)
(NME
Meadow Final Planting Plan: Made with CAD, this plan organizes various types of forbs and grasses in an aesthetic and ecological fashion.
Pollinator Garden Massing Model: This was a preliminary step, made in SketchUp, visualizing the volumes of plants we had chosen where larger cylinders are trees and all smaller volumes are various lower plants.
PLAN LEGEND
SCALE
1" : 30' NORTH
Prairie Meadow Mix (PM)
Building
Mesic Meadow Mix (MM)
Storm Utilities
Upper Rain Meadow Mix (URM)
Paths
Lower Rain Meadow Mix (LRM)
Major Existing Contours
No-Mow Eco-Lawn Mix (NMEL)
Minor Existing Contours
Assorted Plug Drifts
ECB Designation
Light Fixtures
Permeable Pavement
PLAN LEGEND
SCALE
1" : 30' NORTH
Prairie Meadow Mix (PM)
Building
Mesic Meadow Mix (MM)
Storm Utilities
Upper Rain Meadow Mix (URM)
Paths
Lower Rain Meadow Mix (LRM)
Major Existing Contours
No-Mow Eco-Lawn Mix (NMEL)
Minor Existing Contours
Assorted Plug Drifts
ECB Designation
Light Fixtures
Permeable Pavement
Evan Barrow In Association With Gority and Friends LA
Millennium Science Complex University Park, PA
Mod3b Project Dec. 8th 2022 1" = 30'
L - 101
Hand-Drawn Massing Layout: This view of the pollinator garden was used as a prelimary determinant of plant spacing and arrangement.
Final Pollinator Garden Planting Plan: This is the polished plan indicating all the selected plant species and their placements.
Contact Information: Name: Evan G. Barrow Phone: +1 (717) 847-7850 E-mail: eqb5431@psu.edu Socials: @ev.barrow
