7 minute read

drug spending

6 Payor Tactics to Control Drug Spending

By Karen Blum

The growth of high-cost specialty drugs is causing payors to scramble to manage spending on these products, speakers said during the 2022 Managed Health Care Associates Inc. (MHA) Business Summit in Las Vegas. The payors discussed six trends affecting management of specialty and infusion drugs.

1Specialty products are outpacing

traditional medications. Specialty drug spending in 2020 was $265.3 billion, or 49.6% of total pharmacy expenditures, said Kimberly Grant, PharmD, a clinical pharmacist with IPD Analytics, citing published data (Am J Health Syst Pharm 2021;78[14]:1294-1308), and is on target to exceed that this year. Some 65% of new drug approvals in the next three years are estimated to fall into the rare disease or oncology categories, Dr. Grant said.

The increase in specialty products is a challenge for payors, Dr. Grant said. Not only are more drugs being approved; many of them have expanding indications. “When you look into the pipeline, manufacturers are really going after multiple additional indications over the next three to five years,” she said.

One example is efgartigimod alfafcab (Vyvgart, Argenx), approved by the FDA in December 2021 for adults with generalized myasthenia gravis. “It’s a small patient population right now,” Dr. Grant said, “but when you look at Argenx’s goals, they’re looking to be active in about 15 disease states by 2025.” A payor might just focus on a myasthenia gravis policy now but needs to keep these drugs on the radar for additional indications, she said.

She added that products for rare and ultrarare diseases are expected to account for more than 20% of all prescription drug sales by 2024. One-time cell and gene therapies also are increasing.

Currently, payors consider these products individually, Dr. Grant said, but an estimated 25 to 30 million Americans have a rare disease, increasing the chances that payors will have multiple affected beneficiaries. Some drugs, such as onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi (Zolgensma, Novartis) for spinal muscular atrophy, were approved “with a pretty broad label,” she said. In response, payors are trying to manage use of the drug based on how it was studied in clinical trials, “which is a lot stricter than the FDA-approved labeling,” Dr. Grant said. “Currently, about 57% of coverage decisions for cell and gene therapies are more restrictive than the drug’s FDA-approved label.”

Payors also are struggling with how to define value for one-time, potentially curative therapies, without long-term outcomes data, she noted.

2Creative contracting and payment models are gaining trac-

tion. Health plans are engaging in various creative contracts and payment models with manufacturers to contain costs, Dr. Grant said. These include payment plans tied to achieving certain outcomes; mortgage models in which payors make a 20% down payment on a medication, followed by monthly sums; and subscription models in which payors pay a flat monthly fee. There are limited publicly available data on these arrangements, she said.

One area of interest is mobility clauses, Dr. Grant said. If a payor is covering an expensive therapy for a beneficiary, and that person moves to another plan, will the payment plan follow the patient? “I suspect we’re going to be hearing more about the execution of these over the next few years,” she said.

3Biosimilars are predicted to slash drug expenditures.

Biosimilars will likely have the greatest impact on future drug spending, with estimated savings of $38 billion from 2021 to 2025, Dr. Grant said. Some issues remain, including a need for more patient and provider education about these products, and “skinny labels,” where a biosimilar is approved for one of several of a reference product’s indications.

Payor strategies regarding biosimilars vary, she said, with some plans nervous about losing rebates on the reference products still preferring the brand names, others allowing a few preferred biosimilars or an “all-in” attitude. “With biosimilar all-in, you’re losing rebates on the reference products, so you’re going to see a lot of aggressive management strategies in terms of step therapies or prior authorizations just to move patients on to the biosimilars,” she said. Incentivized switch programs may offer beneficiaries a one-time payment to move to a biosimilar or preferred biologic. (For more biosimilars trends, see page 1, as well as box on this page.)

4Pressure is building to shift

to the medical benefit. Plans didn’t historically manage drugs on the medical benefit as strictly as the pharmacy benefit, but now there is increasing economic pressure to do so, Dr. Grant said. Payor strategies here include aggressive site-of-care optimization strategies directing patients to the most cost-effective location to receive medications, and requiring billing through specialty pharmacies, known as bagging strategies, where health systems and physician practices must accept bagged medications from pharmacies to administer to patients. The best option is gold bagging, in which a specialty pharmacy dispenses prescriptions to its own clinics for administration, she said. Some states and professional groups, such as the American Hospital Association, have banned or oppose bagging for its potential disruptions in care.

5Competition is building among patient assistance and access pro-

grams. Manufacturer-sponsored financial assistance programs designed to offset out-of-pocket costs for patients have been offered in multiple formats, such as a coupon/copay cards, free trials, patient assistance programs or bridge/quickstart programs, said Julia Mahler, PharmD, a clinical pharmacist with IPD Analytics. Biosimilars also have patient access programs, Dr. Mahler said, with new programs tending to mirror those of competitor medications. “This is important because if I’m taking adalimumab [Humira, AbbVie] and paying $5 a month, and I’m being switched to a lower-cost biosimilar, I don’t want to be paying more than $5 a month for a brand,” she said. “These patient access programs have to be as robust for biosimilars as they are for the reference brand product.”

6Copay accumulators still in play.

Payors continue to use copay accumulators and maximizer programs to shift costs to manufacturer financial assistance programs, she said. The accumulator adjustments are a strategy to stop copay assistance from being applied to patient deductibles and outof-pocket spending, until a coupon’s value is exhausted. The maximizers take the maximum value of financial assistance programs and split them evenly throughout a coverage year.

Challenges Ahead

The presentation was beneficial to MHA members in attendance, commented Stephen Moll, MBA, the director of sales, Alternate Site Care Division, at MHA, and moderator of the session. “The biggest takeaway was solidification on the direction of the biosimilar market, and that having a very large impact on drugs in the pipeline, as well rod- as the challenges that we’ll still face with d, but a acceptance from doctors using biosimiAme lars to the payor side,” Mr. Moll said. “I hope the presentation gave them enough information to take back and implement into their business of pharmacy.”

3 Biosimilars Strategies

!Negotiate with payors to accept payyors te wit w h p the same reimbursement rate eimbue same as their preferred pharmacy. eir prefeas th

@Work with manufacturers to gain access to limited distribution drugs.

#Become proficient in reimbursement, inventory management and prior authorization/ appeals, and integrate specialty pharmacy–delivered drugs into inventory and electronic medical records systems.

to accept ment rate d pharmac manufa n acces distribut

#B

Source: Kimberly Grant, PharmD.

Dr. Grant has received an unrestricted educational grant from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Dr. Mahler and Mr. Moll reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Copyright © 2022 McMahon Publishing, New York, NY 10036. All rights reserved. Specialty Pharmacy Continuum is published bimonthly by McMahon Publishing. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Specialty Pharmacy Continuum, Circulation Dept., 545 W. 45th St., 8th Floor, New York, NY 10036.

WANT TO SUBSCRIBE? CHANGE YOUR ADDRESS? HERE’S HOW

Selected U.S. hospital pharmacists and healthcare personnel re ceive Specialty Pharmacy Continuum free of charge. If you are a hospital pharmacist and do not receive the publication, you must add your professional address or make your address change directly with Specialty Pharmacy Continuum, Circulation Dept., 545 W. 45th St., 8th Floor, New York, NY 10036. You can also fax your request to (815) 366–8297, or send it via email, circulation@mcmahonmed.com. If you are not a hospital pharmacist but would like to re ceive Specialty Pharmacy Continuum, please send a check for $77.00 (U.S.) or $97.00 (outside U.S.) for a year’s subscription pay able to Specialty Pharmacy Continuum to McMahon Publishing, 545 West 45th St., 8th Floor, New York, NY 10036. Please allow 8 to 12 weeks for delivery of the first issue. In dividual issues are $10.00 (U.S.) or $13.00 (outside U.S.).

Founded in 1972, McMahon Publishing is a family-owned medical publisher of clinical newspapers and specialty periodicals, and creates continuing medical education programs and custom publications. As the second largest publisher of medical newspapers, McMahon produces Anesthesiology News, Gastroenterology & Endos copy News, General Surgery News, Infectious Disease Special Edition, Pain Medicine News, Phar macy Practice News and Specialty Pharmacy Continuum.