From the Utopia of the city of the fourth landscape to the maintenance and development of laboratories of the fourth landscape (city landscape weak schedule and happy)
The theory of architecture of the city and landscape should develop a more complex methodology to impose itself as the new discipline of the future. A new season must be opened through rethinking relationships NatureLandscape, Landscape - Land, Landscape - the environment, town-landscape, Landscape - City - eco regions, Macro regions and ecosystems, etc. and hence the possible redefinition of intervention techniques. It must be perceived that Jhon Dixon Hunt calls After Life, life after the end of the yard. Switching from a history of landscape architecture to a history of how the transformation of the world has seen leading architecture and planning, is still a story inaccurate. The history of built-up is not helpful without a wider evolutionary framework, the terminological confusion between landscape and nature, landscape and ecology of the landscape, and between landscape and territory, and finally between city and countryside makes it difficult to talk about the third or fourth city in the landscape. The tale is not a tale about the beauty of no-city, nor a hymn to that out of town, or yet another attempt to dissolve the dialectic between town and country, but the attempt to describe and tell a possibility that move away tourism as a priority objective for the benefit of a different type of tourism (tour of the third type of learning, adaptive and non-consumer) characterized by research and experiential learning, and able to excite and learn, in order to lead to a permanent settlement consistent with the idea of being able to live in the city of the fourth landscape and 114