5 minute read

The Life of a Research Section: Social Sciences

“Sections” of the School for Spiritual Science founded by Rudolf Steiner serve medicine, pedagogy, agriculture, the social sciences, visual arts, performing arts, literary arts and humanities, natural science, mathematics and astronomy, and the spiritual striving of youth.

The Section for the Social Sciences in North America

In any Section of the School of Spiritual Science, not all members work on a single theme; rather, each individual generally works on the issue or issues that present themselves in life. This can allow us to research and be active in areas that we love.

The Section for the Social Sciences, by its very nature, includes a particularly wide range of interests: members work in and represent research and activities touching on every realm of social life. As described on the Goetheanum website:

The Section for Social Sciences is concerned with human relationships in the three spheres of social life: economic, legal and cultural/spiritual. Depending on the sphere different fundamental questions arise:

How are the basic needs of the world’s population to be met? What responsibility does a citizen bear for the common good? What does a human being need from the world in order to reach his or her potential?

With such questions in mind the Section conducts research, pursuing insight and creative forms in a range of areas including: family culture, biography work, conflict resolution/peace studies, addiction, economic questions and the science, practice and politics of law.

The Section for the Social Sciences in North America was founded in June 1987; over time, eight points emerged, eight areas which, we believe, continue to indicate the Section’s scope in 2010:

1. to foster and encourage individual and collaborative research at local, regional and national levels with a focus on social lawfulness and the threefold nature of social life.

2. to work toward a deeper understanding of the spiritual beings connected to social life.

3. to recognize that the sacrament of human encounter is an essential task for this section.

4. to do what we can—humanly, socially, and spiritually—to encourage and support the initiative and research capacities of members of this section, and to cultivate collaboration with other sections of the School for Spiritual Science.

5. to provide local support in the branches of the Anthroposophical Society.

6. to foster consciousness of world events in a spiritual context.

7. to encourage associations of individuals and groups sharing common interests.

8. to create forums of meeting to help heal social ills and relationships.

A mighty set of tasks! One can see how work in the Section for the Social Sciences cannot but interweave with that of other sections. And one can wonder: How does this set of guideposts play out in a practical way? How does life within the Section for the Social Sciences manifest?

The section itself consists of about 140 members. Within the section, a Traveling Collegium meets with geographically scattered groups—generally twice a year—and sponsors a twiceyearly newsletter, providing members a forum of colleagues. The North American section maintains a close connection with that at the Goetheanum and was happily able to send two Collegium members to a Section for Social Sciences meeting in Dornach in November 2009. That year also saw cosponsorship of a public conference in Spring Valley and a “Round Table on Economics” at the Annual General Meeting of the Anthroposophical Society. At both the latter events younger friends were visible and active.

The heart of the section lies in the initiative of members. In some areas—the Northern California and Berkshire-Taconic groups come to mind—Section members meet regularly to study and share work-in-progress. Members who work with youth groups, offer workshops on social threefolding, work in social finance, provide mediation, or otherwise offer special services, bring their section perspective to that work.

Mention of a few recent articles in the section newsletter may give some flavor of the nature and variety of endeavor: Alexander Cameron described a “collaborative research in study,” an epistemological study with a (non-anthroposophical) colleague; Denis Schneider wrote of “developing community through art” in the form of writing workshops; Meg Gorman asked “What Shall We Do About Ahriman,” an article also published in Das Goetheanum; Chris Schaefer offered practical advice on things we can do relating to our very own financial institutions; Richard Rettig has brought a three-fold perspective to such contemporary issues as same-sex marriage and the liberal-conservative divide in politics; Stephen Usher delved into presentday world events in “The Present Crisis: The Surface Explanation and the Deep One;” Luigi Morelli described weaving the seven life processes into nonviolent communication and social technology modalities; Addie Bianchi described peace activities in the Israel-Palestinian area; Carl Flygt expanded his work on “Goethean conversation;” and so on …

A final quote from the Section at the Goetheanum may characterize a key aspect of the Section for the Social Sciences:

Of primary importance is the conversation between the various members of the section who are doing scientific research. Today one can no longer undertake any research on the social level in some ivory tower—exploratory conversations and exchange with others is essential.