Reality Check:

Are we all counterfeits? Can I define the real version of myself? Many people know the counterfeit version of me — a construct that tiptoes along social ideals to provide a performance of self. But counterfeit identities are everywhere. Social media, pop culture and AI have reshaped the definition of one’s ‘real self’. So what defines authenticity in today’s world of judgemental media, one of false identities and impossible ideals?

Image-based social media platforms think they’ve found the formula. The ‘real self’ trend and apps like BeReal have engulfed the globe in hopes of shifting the vernacular towards reality. But is it really beneficial? Social media was initially constructed to share life’s highlights — to show moments spent with friends or on holiday and to connect with others. That was until platforms like Instagram became a cesspool for influencers to generate income through their appearance, ensuing envious comparison between the lives of the ordinary and the highly edited images of young influencers. Many have now attempted to counteract the toxicity of contemporary social media by portraying their ‘authentic’ self.

Aimed at improving general wellbeing, the ‘authenticity’ trend tries to reconnect users with real human bodies, encouraging the expression of natural bodily differences without comparison. Contrasting pictures of influencers filtered and unfiltered; smiling and crying, have filled social media pages. But this trend becomes problematic when you realise that every image is curated. The hashtag, ‘#bodypositivity’, and the concept of the ‘authentic self’ are flawed because their entire premise is built on theatrics. Its portrayal of real life shows the polar ends of human emotion — posting pictures at one’s happiest while simultaneously in tears. None of it is truly real. Humans don’t instinctively choose to photograph themselves during a mental breakdown, unless there is a potential reward.